Tight little Vampires edited

by p00nmonster on 09 May 2011

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Vampires is tight. notes and feedback?

Deck Tags

  • Tournament

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 997 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

005000

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Tight little Vampires edited

Brink is wholly unnecessary. as are Bonehoard, Bloodhusk, and Baronry.(hmmm . . . illiteration). Beyond that, it just seems a bit spead out. Maybe reduce the number of different cards and distil it a bit, then get more of the cards you're keeping.

1
Posted 09 May 2011 at 22:40

Permalink

i agree with barony and brink, gonna replace them with 2 more gatekeepers, but whats the problem with bonehoard and bloodhusk?

0
Posted 10 May 2011 at 01:06

Permalink

They don't fit. In a vamp deck, you shouldn't be playing long enough for there to be that many dead things. Bloodhusk is nice . . . in a mono black discard deck. It's basically going to end up being a 2/2 for three, worse than Baronry. It's not a bad card but not worth putting in this deck. Also, I'd sideboard Bloodseeker in lieu of 2 more pulstrackers or bloodghasts, then switch 'em in if you're going against a creature intensive/swarm deck.

0
Posted 10 May 2011 at 04:45

Permalink

Ah, thanks for the tips, i took them and a few other cards out, replaced bonehoard with another strata scythe, put in a crypt of agadeem another gatekeeper and bloodseeker then threw in some quag sickness.

0
Posted 10 May 2011 at 05:23

Permalink