wouldn't opt be slightly better than consider here? That way you're not forced to dump a dragon into your graveyard if you're looking for war cry. Love the idea though +1
Permalink
if you have Equation, but not a bio visionary and a board of other creatures, then yes- you'd have to play both in the same turn if you want to avoid paying the cost. The more efficient way would be the reverse- already have bio visionary out- pact for augmenter/equation, and then play equation for 5. if you just want to instant out creatures- then something like chord of calling might work better, or even a transmute card like drift of phantasms- which can find both pieces of the combo for you also.
sick idea! i think this is a deck that might benefit to some degree from summoner's pact. It can grab both pieces of the combo if needed for free and since biovisionary triggers at the end of the turn, you shouldn't have to worry about the backend of it.
this may be a crazy thought also- but since you're going in all in on that token production now- something that something that takes advantage of sacking artifacts or something could be something to play around with also- maybe like voltage surge or deadly dispute, or makeshift munitions or orcish vandal. they'd also be able to play with you're bridge if you needed more late game to finish off or something.
have you done any play testing yet? curious how experimental synthesizer is playing.
Looks cool! I'd maybe cut neonate's rush for some more vamps though. That card feels underwhelming and 16 creatures feels pretty light for a tribal build. If stensia's banquet is the finisher, I'd imagine you need as many vamps as possible to make it worth it? good luck with it!