Budget Decks: New Blue-Red

by NorthernWarlord on 25 May 2014

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Are you bored? Does Magic: The Gathering feel old and vapid? Got any useless bucks in your bank account? Ladies and Gentlemen, I have solution.
Use your bank account on nearest MtG marketplace website and buy some cheap cards, craft a deck, and challenge your friends! To double the fun, ask your friend to create such a deck too!
The Budget Decks -series is meant for your free time! These are meant to inspire you, and deck's value is meant to be low! (Between 10 and 20 bucks.)

How to Play

Who said that Blue-Red decks must always be burn ones?
This deck attempts to crush and smash your opponent using bunch of cool creatures, while casting some other spells to wreak havoc.

Deck Tags

  • Control
  • Aggro
  • Budget
  • Cheap

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

11
Likes

This deck has been viewed 3,675 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0280400

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Budget Decks: New Blue-Red

I would think more instants and sorceries would benefit this deck

0
Posted 26 May 2014 at 00:34

Permalink

particularly with guttersnipe. :) however, the description says that this deck is supposed to be creature based so yeah. :) in that vein... You should have goliath sphinx in here. :)

0
Posted 26 May 2014 at 01:24

Permalink

brute force or titan's strength could work well then, triggering guttersnipe's ability and pumping up creatures for extra damage

0
Posted 26 May 2014 at 08:29

Permalink

Yeah. That sounds worthwhile.

1
Posted 26 May 2014 at 08:50

Permalink

Please... No magefire wings... Brute Force man!

0
Posted 26 May 2014 at 15:38

Permalink

Okay... Though I love Magefire Wings. But I've always done what people suggest, so I don't care about my own opinion anymore.

1
Posted 26 May 2014 at 16:30

Permalink

Why no magefire wings???? I like that card. what is wrong with it?

0
Posted 26 May 2014 at 17:39

Permalink

yeah magefire wings is a cool card.

0
Posted 26 May 2014 at 20:03

Permalink

Because auras...

0
Posted 27 May 2014 at 01:33

Permalink

You can keep magefire wings if you want though.

0
Posted 27 May 2014 at 01:34

Permalink

I'm too spikey

0
Posted 27 May 2014 at 01:34

Permalink

I just remembered.... BUDGET UR DELVER!!! I love that deck so much in pauper. (Though, chain lighting can be a bit expensive, even though it is a common). I'll see if I can build and link a version that doesn't use chain lightning.

0
Posted 26 May 2014 at 17:57

Permalink

Not a fan of chain lightning. unless you are running it in a stuffy doll deck. :)

1
Posted 26 May 2014 at 17:58

Permalink

I'm a huge fan of it. It only hurts in Burn vs Burn, but then you will only cast it when you have 2 more red mana open than your opponent. I do love it with stuffy doll and seething song....

0
Posted 26 May 2014 at 18:07

Permalink

most of the time I just don't care for using a card that my opponent can hurt me essentially for free with. unless my deck is designed to take advantage of that.

0
Posted 26 May 2014 at 18:09

Permalink

Here's my version of budget Izzet.

http://www.mtgvault.com/logazor/decks/ur-pauper-delver/

0
Posted 26 May 2014 at 18:28

Permalink