Can't touch this(paupermodern)

by Newish on 06 June 2013

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (14 cards)

Sorceries (2)


Instants (2)

Fog2xFog

Artifacts (2)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,255 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

070042

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Can't touch this(paupermodern)

Moldervine cloak is uncommon.

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 14:32

Permalink

It became common in Modern Masters

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 14:40

Permalink

Oh! Didnt know they reprinted it. =)

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 14:54

Permalink

I'm glad they did =) otherwise I would have gone with Oakenform. PS: this deck still needs alot of work :/

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 15:04

Permalink

I'd try and help, but Green is literally my worst color. I can't build a green deck to save my life!

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 15:12

Permalink

When I run green decks, I have more powerful starting creatures. Look at removing a few enchantments and adding a few more generals to lead the army.

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 16:11

Permalink

The problem with adding "generals" is that this is a pauper deck which point is to have creatures with hexproof. I could add creatures without hexproof and more power, with some instants to give hexproof, but then enemy would get a chance to kill my creatures. By having creatures with hexproof I can focus all my efforts on getting them bigger.

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 16:13

Permalink

Thrun, the Last Troll, or even Sacred Wolves could add a little more bite.

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 16:21

Permalink

I have sacred wolf, but Thrun is mythic rare and as one, cannot be put into a pauper deck (pauper is a format where you must build a deck by only using cards rated as "common" in atleast one set)

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 16:34

Permalink

Firehawk2432 has deleted this comment.

Posted 19 June 2013 at 16:36

Permalink

Firehawk2432 has deleted this comment.

Posted 19 June 2013 at 16:36

Permalink

Oh completely overlooked the wolf >.< I'm a little newer to magic so I did not know that haha.

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 16:39

Permalink

haha it's ok :P

0
Posted 20 June 2013 at 21:26

Permalink

Wouldn't Rancor be better in this deck than Forced Adaptation? 2/0 is right now as opposed to +1/+1 next upkeep, with trample to boot.

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 21:07

Permalink

Rancor is not common...

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 21:34

Permalink

Rancor was common in Duel Decks: Garruk vs. Liliana, Archenemy, and Urza's Legacy. If it was ever common, it is allowed.

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 21:37

Permalink

Really? I always thought that it was the most recently printed copy that was the standard for its predecessors.

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 21:43

Permalink

https://www.wizards.com/magic/tcg/resources.aspx?x=magic/rules/pauper

Quote: "Example: Counterspell was a common card in the Seventh Edition core set, which was released on Magic Online. Counterspell was reprinted in Masters Edition II with an uncommon expansion symbol. Both versions of the card can be used in the Pauper format."

Enjoy your Rancor good Sir.

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 22:07

Permalink

huh, learned something new today.

1
Posted 19 June 2013 at 22:13

Permalink

That's why we are all here.

0
Posted 19 June 2013 at 22:14

Permalink

Rancor would be good indeed. Only reason it got cut (for now) is the price :D I am rooting for low budget decks! Especially when they are as unstable as this one =) But thanks for the comment!

0
Posted 20 June 2013 at 21:26

Permalink