Konjester

445 Decks, 94 Comments, 14 Reputation

I haven't actually gotten any playtesting with this deck... I was building it for FNM, however... A few bigger tourneys came up followed by game day, and I decided to play a more competitive deck for those. I'll be re-building this one for FNM this week though. I'll keep you posted on how it goes.

0
Posted 25 February 2013 at 15:09 in reply to #322482 on Lands? What Lands?

Permalink

I like that idea.... But.... I have no idea where I'd find room....

0
Posted 24 February 2013 at 09:49 in reply to #326246 on Boros Deck Wins

Permalink

Ive been debating on adding in a couple rancor, not sure where id put it though... Stalker would be alright, I just didn't want a plain body(non-exalted) But, the hexproof and unblockable might get him in place of my Sureblades.... Maybe. But, he's easily killed by whipflare and such. . . .

Curious, what is the idea you'll be conveying?

0
Posted 20 February 2013 at 18:01 in reply to #325153 on Modern Bant Exalted (help?)

Permalink

I'm going to try the Primal Hunters, Clan Defiances, and Spell Runptures instead of my Relentless, Bonfires, and my Syncopates. At least to see how they run. I tried the Defiance before, but, only for a match or 2... I just didn't like that it could only hit a couple of creatures as opposed to their whole board... Have you played using the Defiances? If so, what's your opinion?

0
Posted 11 February 2013 at 08:25 in reply to #322915 on RUG Midrange

Permalink

Agro? Haha

0
Posted 04 February 2013 at 10:36 in reply to #321310 on BUG Midrange

Permalink

Thanks for your input!
I do find myself on turn 3, looking at Biomancer and Ranger in hand, and thinking "Why do I have you Ranger?"
So, I agree in that sense. As for the clan defiance, do you think I should play a 1 of that still or replace it with a third Bonfire? In either case, why?

0
Posted 04 February 2013 at 06:16 in reply to #321269 on RUG "Bubbles"

Permalink

I played this in an Open Qualifier on Saturday. . . . Didn't do so hot.
Round 1: Naya Humans. 2-1
Round 2: RDW. 0-2
Round 3: Naya Agro. 1-2
Round 4: Selesnya Agro: 2-1
Round 5: RDW. 1-2

All in all, I had a very tough time with fast-paced decks...

Im thinking about taking one Thrag, one rancor, and the clan defiance out. Replaced with 2 Wolfir Silverheart and a third bonfire.

0
Posted 04 February 2013 at 01:28 as a comment on RUG "Bubbles"

Permalink

Could you explain your sideboard choices? I'm currently messing with a RUG build for standard myself. . . But, I can't seem to get my sideboard straightened out.

Here's my RUG build:
http://www.mtgvault.com/konjester/decks/rug-bubbles/

0
Posted 04 February 2013 at 01:16 as a comment on RUG Biomancy

Permalink

I really like this deck. Zombies are definitely a fun one to play. Only sad thing is that Gatecrash didn't come out with any direct zombie support...

1
Posted 26 January 2013 at 00:41 as a comment on [Standard] BUG Zombies

Permalink

I thought about lightning storm.... But, its not what Im looking for with the deck. It's good, and some extra damage, but at the same time, it does about the same thing that my Seismic assault does, and, with assault being played on turn 3 and a swans turn 4 for the game.... It works better than a turn 4 Swans followed by a turn 5 Lightning storm. . . 1 turn can be all the difference. The reason I don't play Crucible, is because Im trying to ditch my lands, I have enough to cast any of the cards that I want in there, Ulamog is only there for his shuffle ability, which I need for the infinite. If crucible brought them to hand, then Id play it, but it allows for them to be played from the grave.... Meaning I don't get them back in my deck and I don't get their hits off of Seismic.
Thank you for the suggestions though, they were both on my list until I fine-tuned it. =]

0
Posted 26 January 2013 at 00:37 in reply to #318864 on Seismic Swans

Permalink

Thanks! Those are really good suggestions. I had Nevermore mained because sometimes it makes all the difference. Calling a Jace or an Entreat the angels on a bant deck, calling Hellrider on RDW, or even calling Thragtusk against, well, most of the meta...

0
Posted 24 January 2013 at 07:16 in reply to #318449 on Enchant All The Things!

Permalink

Thank you! And I agree with your comments on Talrand and Thrag. Definitely agree with Rift, not sure why I didnt throw that in before, as for unsummon, it is great in a bind, I just never had much love for it... We don't have ponder and mana leak, but, we do have Index and Dissipate. Im thinking a 2-Index, 2 Rift, and 2-Unsummon ass in for the Talrand and Thrag spots. Maybe when Gatecrash hits it'll boost Delver's chances... Just a couple weeks away, we'll see.

0
Posted 24 January 2013 at 03:14 in reply to #318404 on R.U.G. Delver

Permalink

Ive thought about it. . . . And I think it would be a great add, Im just unsure of which fatty would work well in here. Serenity has removal and a nice power to her. Griselbrand, well, he's Griselbrand. Other Fatties Ive considered are: Primordial Hydra, all the excess mana could make him HUGE; Niv-Mizzet, not nearly as big as the other options, but, he adds draw power and another outlet for mana; Avacyn, making all of my defenders and Planeswalkers indestructible? Yes please; and Gisela, a test subject and/or a Thragtusk swinging with her can be devastating.

0
Posted 24 January 2013 at 03:08 in reply to #318401 on Defending the Door

Permalink

Thanks, I thought it was appropriate. =D

0
Posted 24 January 2013 at 03:03 in reply to #318389 on Enchant All The Things!

Permalink

As Jack said, the Delvers and Stalkers are the main source of damage. The spears are almost strictly for removal(unless you have the opportunity to knock the last bit of life from your opponent). The Izzet charms are mainly in there as a placeholder for Simic charms in gatecrash, however, they add an extra counter that comes in handy. Thragtusks, fogs, and dissipates are in there to hold on long enough to get in the damage.

0
Posted 23 January 2013 at 19:27 in reply to #318350 on R.U.G. Delver

Permalink

In all the EDH I play, you need 20 Poison counters to die

0
Posted 29 August 2012 at 06:55 as a comment on Honor is a cowards tool (infect EDH)

Permalink

I love the deck, Damia is a commander I've been tinkering with lately... Have you considered Jace Beleren or Sorin Markov as adds? Sorin's -3 ability kills in EDH and Jace is a nice little draw engine that people usually don't target(due to his making everyone draw a card as a +2 ability.

If you have time, please check out my EDH deck build around Damia(or Mimeoplasm really)
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=378460

0
Posted 27 August 2012 at 13:42 as a comment on Damia, Sage of Stone - EDH

Permalink

I like this deck a lot. A friend of mine plays a B/W token deck, and he loves it. I've tried it out and I have to say, spamming an average of 3-6 creatures buffed with Virtue and Honor? That's really not bad. The black that he played was only for removal and flashing back Lingering Souls.

If you have a chance, check out my Boros Humans? I want to make the deck a little faster/more versatile. . . And I'm a little clueless on how I'll be changing it post-rotation...
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=378128

0
Posted 27 August 2012 at 13:37 as a comment on Post rotation budget boros tokens?

Permalink

I love the idea of this deck, and would like to try it out for myself, but I don't wanna build it when it's rotating out fairly soon....
Have you tried this out in a tournament or anything?

0
Posted 27 August 2012 at 13:22 as a comment on Look At My Shinies!

Permalink

I quite like this in actual play, it's surprisingly quick. A friend of mine has used it to top 4 in our FNM for the past 2 weeks.

If you have time, please check out this deck, I'd really appreciate your insight!

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=378128

0
Posted 27 August 2012 at 13:17 as a comment on Quirion Delver

Permalink

61-80 of 86 items