Vampirez

by KilakMorganstien on 01 August 2010

Main Deck (62 cards)

Sorceries (8)


Instants (4)


Planeswalkers (2)


Artifacts (3)


Enchantments (4)


Land (22)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

simple deck i threw together, hanking about building. Give me some ideas?

Deck Tags

  • Fun

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 738 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

005300

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Vampirez

I would go against Kalitas, there are better cards for less than him. He's nice, but I don't think he'll be any better than a sideboard card, unfortunately. I would say throw an Anowon, the Ruin Sage in there, and for the other Kalitas, take him and the 3 Child of Night out for Vampire Nighthawk. Nighthawk is a staple in any Vamp deck, in my opinion. Also, I would take two Blood Seekers out for Pulse Trackers. Very nice one drops that can do some good damage right away, but it's not a necessity, as Blood Seekers are great cards in their own right. The BA's were a beautiful touch, 4 is amazing to have. Drana's all right, I think her ability's a tad too costly for what it does. Makes it hard to get rid of a lot of creatues >3 toughness if you don't have the mana for it, which there are a lot of in the Zendikar metagame. You could keep her if you like her ability, and it's done you some good, but personally, I would try to get a Malakir Bloodwitch in. Little bit more of a reliable ability, along with protection, flying, and a solis P/T. Consme Spirit's nice, but I would switch them out for Tendrils of Corruption. Tendrils seems a bit more reliable, since you'll have mostly swamps on you anyway, and although Consume can target the player, you'll be surprised to notice that you'll rarely be using them to knock out the player, and they'll mostly be used on the creatures anyway. All in all, I give it a 7.6. Not a bad deck to start with, but some changes'll have to be made. I hope this helps. :) My Lord this is long... x_x

0
Posted 01 August 2010 at 22:42

Permalink

thanks vampiric i really battled with putting katalis in i like the card but not the cost ill probably take him out maybe pulse seeker instead. This was very helpful haha thanks a million lol.

0
Posted 01 August 2010 at 23:05

Permalink

Mana curve is bad. Very very bad. Also, Katalis just doesnt fit.

0
Posted 01 August 2010 at 22:54

Permalink