Mill (Standard format)

by Keigan on 04 September 2012

Main Deck (61 cards)


Enchantments (4)


Land (18)

Sideboard (7 cards)

Sorceries (1)


Instants (1)


Enchantments (2)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Defend and mill! Or kill if Jace's phantasm survives... sideboard cards are just there if I want to rebuild using snapcaster, but it was a bit too expensive (money wise).

Should explain that I built this only from M13 and latest block since the other ones are rotated out October 5th. Might rebuild if Ravnica offers up something fun!

Deck Tags

  • Mill

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

5
Likes

This deck has been viewed 2,124 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

053000

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Mill (Standard format)

This is a standard format as I see it, right? Actually an good idea as mill has actually chance of winning in standard :'(

Altho, why no mana leak in here? :o

Have you considered undead alchemist? :D they're good if you have only 2x of them, and can give you more zombies.
Can't think of any other standard mill cards cept for jace's erasure, which is kinda slow :(
You'll also need at least one Jace, Memory adept.

I'll be watching this deck with interest :D

0
Posted 09 September 2012 at 11:42

Permalink

Undead alchemist would work, but I feel I would need to rebuild the deck quite a bit. RIght now I'm not focusing on attacking at all except with Jace's phantasm (which is just too good to not have in a mill deck imo).

Regarding Mana leak I decided to build this only from M13 and the latest block since the other ones are kicked out from type2 on Oct the 5th. Otherwise I def would have that.

Jace is just too expensive right now in terms of money, so the reason I don't include him is same reason as for snapcaster mage. Wanted an inexpensive deck to begin with. Otherwise I probably would have tried building around secrets of the dead, snapcaster mage and flashback spells.

0
Posted 09 September 2012 at 13:32

Permalink