Angels Ascendant

by Kayin on 28 May 2010

Main Deck (64 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

A fun Deck of Only Angel and Angelic Creatures.
Needs a bit of updating. Any thoughts or feelings?

There are no restrictions in terms of cards or their block. Only that they be angelic.

So Far Mono white - but It could be expanded to multi color.

Would be happy for thoughts and comments.
Cheers!

This deck needs some serious work...

Deck Tags

  • Combo

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,313 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

610000

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Angels Ascendant

all the creatures cost too high to pla yin early game, mono red will kill you i guarentee

0
Posted 28 May 2010 at 22:08

Permalink

Yeah... early game I get slaughtered. Thoughts? Maybe some green with Fog and mana acceleration?

0
Posted 28 May 2010 at 22:12

Permalink

No. Instead, you should use 4 x Luminarch Ascension. Having a lot of high-cost mana angels is useless. You don't even need to cast them. Find a way to discard some Iona's and use Emeria, the Sky Ruin to return it to the battlefield. For mana acceleration, you should use 4 x Knight Of The White Orchid, which is a pretty useful card (if you cast it before putting a land). Quicksands is useless. I would recommend you to consider pretty useful white-control based cards like Martial Coup, Day Of Judgment and Planar Cleansing. They will help you to gain more time. Ajani is also useful, as he has a cheap mana cost.

0
Posted 29 May 2010 at 09:21

Permalink

maybe a Battlegrace Angel or two? i kinda like them

0
Posted 16 June 2010 at 22:08

Permalink

Agreed.

0
Posted 22 June 2010 at 20:18

Permalink