Red Thirst

by jvidas7 on 05 February 2015

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Please help with comments.

Deck Tags

  • Vampire
  • Aggro
  • +1/+1 Counters
  • Tribal
  • Budget

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

7
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,319 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

008350

Deck Format


Modern

NOTE: Set by owner when deck was made.

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Red Thirst

Have you tried looking in Zendikar for more vampire cards? That block did wonders for vampires.

0
Posted 06 February 2015 at 04:41

Permalink

Yes, I did. I have to test this version more. Maybe I will make some more changes with the Zendikar edition.

0
Posted 06 February 2015 at 11:55

Permalink

And also, is there a budget to the deck, or are you working with what you have? If not, you might wanna try some dual lands, like dragonskull summit, or hell blackcleave cliffs if you think your deck can be fast enough.

2
Posted 06 February 2015 at 13:46

Permalink

To be honest, I'm working with what I have. I think that deck will work without duals. What do you think?

0
Posted 06 February 2015 at 15:53

Permalink

If you want cheap, you should get maybe a few guildgates, or if you want a better cheap one, try bloodfell caves

1
Posted 07 February 2015 at 00:09

Permalink

Deck seems pretty good for the money it costs to run.
Maybe consider running Yahenni, Undying Partisan? He's only a couple dollars and would do well with a stormkirk captain out.
I'm also not a huge fan of whispersilk cloak. Maybe run Cosmotronic wave instead and prevent all blocking for the turn?
Either way, this is pretty solid as-is, so +1 from me.

0
Posted 17 November 2018 at 21:07

Permalink