Julian

8 Decks, 8 Comments, 0 Reputation

Wow cant believe i looked over that...that is a great idea instant poison counter without having to get one of my infect dudes through. Thanks man great idea.

0
Posted 22 November 2010 at 08:35 in reply to #101372 on Proliferate (budget standard)

Permalink

I had steady progress in it originally and didn't like it, but you make a valid point..I chose throne because I can leave it in play and as they kill my arti-creatures I can sac them to proliferate,or in a worst case I can sac the throne to itself. That made it into a choice between 3 mana for a card or 2 mana for no card..I went with the lower mana curve..but I might try to put steady's back in there. Thanks for the advice.

0
Posted 22 November 2010 at 08:34 in reply to #101348 on Proliferate (budget standard)

Permalink

Possible 3rd turn Demon and turn four 14 damage..if you put Tainted Strike in that could be a turn four kill... That doesn't sound to slow to me...

0
Posted 21 November 2010 at 21:47 as a comment on Strandardized Sacrifice

Permalink

Captivating Vampire would help your dudes not die to mass removal, including your own Marsh Casualties...and Kalastria Highborn would work well with Bloodthrone.. With Nighthawks main deck you could drop Vampires Bite and put Doomblade in Sb.. Mindsludge also works real well to thin out your opponents threats to your dudes.

0
Posted 21 November 2010 at 21:41 as a comment on vampire

Permalink

EDIT: realized I got the play sequence a little backwards... "Thanks for the advice, im not sure i agree with you on the Nighthawk, it is an amazing creature, yes...but for three mana kinda skrews up the whole "disciple aspect" of the deck. On turn three id like to be able Swing in for 6-12 and then sac 2-3 creatures to a Bloodthrone and have three mana open to drain life for 4-6 with Kalastria. I will play test it some more with the Nighthawks in and see how it goes. With the seers I dont think i'll have a problem with card advantage, I will at least be able to stack the deck a little in my favor.

0
Posted 17 November 2010 at 01:10 as a comment on Standard Vampires

Permalink

Thanks for the advice, im not sure i agree with you on the Nighthawk, it is an amazing creature...but for three mana kinda skrews up the whole "disciple aspect" of the deck. On turn three id like to be able to sac 2-3 creatures to a Kalastria and have three mana open to drain life for 4-6 and than swing in for 4-6 as well. I will play test it some more with the Nighthawks in and see how it goes. With the seers I dont think i'll have a problem with card advantage, I will at least be able to stack the deck a little in my favor.

0
Posted 17 November 2010 at 01:06 in reply to #100227 on Standard Vampires

Permalink

Thanks, found that card after the fact so was planning on changin it anyway.

0
Posted 15 November 2010 at 13:04 in reply to #99769 on U/B Discard (standard)

Permalink