Charming American

by J-Rod on 11 July 2013

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Creatures (4)


Instants (11)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

nivix cyclops + artful dodge + Boroscharm( doublestrike) + any other instant/sorcery = 20 damage unblockable

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 1,100 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

6170283

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Charming American

I like the deck, but it is very one sided. You basicly have a deck that has one big move, and if a you play a deck with counterspells or any type of bounce cards, you are dead. You do have some removal in Pillar, but its not enough. In the meta right now, there are a lot of decks that use almost no creatures. You need cards like Boros Reckoner, Silence, Essence Scatter, Negate, Aetherling, and more cards to cause trickery. Aetherling is almost a must. He is the best creature in standard (arguable), with him being to avoid anything from removal to damage. Try to proxy out some cards and see what plays better. As I said, I do like the deck, but it has only 1 win con, and its not all that reliable.

0
Posted 15 July 2013 at 02:45

Permalink

One fog or azorius charm, and your down..

0
Posted 16 July 2013 at 16:53

Permalink

counter. people forget there are 3 modes to izzet and boros charm. and u would have to be dumb to swing a finisher while unsure. they are tapped out go for it. if not let your guttersnipes and pyromancers do work. its simple, consistent, and deadly. but i do agree on silence for this deck. that would add a better safety measure to get my attacks through.

1
Posted 17 July 2013 at 16:13

Permalink

Yea while your deck might be better (MIGHT) it's also 150 dollars more expensive
GJ

0
Posted 01 August 2013 at 00:43

Permalink