Vampire rush

by Johito on 28 September 2010

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sorceries (4)


Instants (4)


Artifacts (4)


Enchantments (4)


Land (20)

Sideboard (16 cards)

Sorceries (2)


Instants (4)


Land (1)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Cheap and fatal vampire rush deck.

It's a little risk to play with only 15 mana. But i have played this deck some times, and i realy like how fast it is. I can do what ever i want with 3 mana.

The combination with spells and creatures in this deck is pretty good. And urge to feed is more effective than you think. It's a realy good way to boost the vampires.

Deck Tags

  • Horde

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

6
Likes

This deck has been viewed 3,851 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

005600

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Vampire rush

Not bad, but demons horn is a waste of space

0
Posted 28 September 2010 at 08:45

Permalink

Well i don't think so, i gain much life from it. And i lose some life from bought Vampire lacerator and phyrexian arena so i think it's necessary. I had 16 land and 2 demons horn, but i think it's bether this way..

0
Posted 28 September 2010 at 09:22

Permalink

Very nice idea, love the low cost of the deck

0
Posted 28 September 2010 at 10:21

Permalink

Thanks! The funny part is that all the creatures usually becomes pretty strong in just some few turns..

0
Posted 28 September 2010 at 10:26

Permalink

demon horn is nice with alot of vamps but you should go looking for some bloodchiefs ascension it might be more effective and it'll help kill them and help you survive if your beginning game doesn't pan out.

0
Posted 29 September 2010 at 13:47

Permalink

Yea, i have toght of that. But I think demons horn are more inportant in my deck. My vampiers are strong enough, i think.

0
Posted 30 September 2010 at 14:59

Permalink

and if you really wanted to be dickish with this deck i'd throw in some dark depths to go along with your vampire hexmage can't argue with 4th turn 20/20 for the cost of a 2/2 maybe bigger from a vampire pump but still a nice trade off.

0
Posted 29 September 2010 at 13:53

Permalink

Wow, i havent tought of that.. Sweet! Thanks for the idea! :)

0
Posted 30 September 2010 at 15:02

Permalink

although that makes people shoot for the vampire hexmage alot more the same thing happened to me with my preeminent captain now they all hold the lightning bolts for em' its awesome. :)

0
Posted 30 September 2010 at 23:30

Permalink

Yes, but i'll probably have a captivating vampire out in the game. So the would need to lightning blots! :P

0
Posted 01 October 2010 at 01:26

Permalink

no demon horn but other than that the mana ramp is crazy i really like this deck

0
Posted 01 October 2010 at 06:14

Permalink

You guys are starting to convince me to remove the demon horns, but what do you think i should add? Blade od thr bloodchief maby?

0
Posted 01 October 2010 at 06:20

Permalink

Blade of the bloodchief *

0
Posted 01 October 2010 at 06:25

Permalink

does blade of the blood chief heal? i thought i just gave two +1/+1 counters everytime it deals damage. i'm sticking with bloodchiefs ascension but you could sideboard the demon horns against other black decks.

0
Posted 01 October 2010 at 09:04

Permalink

I agree! I have already bought 3 bloodchiefs ascension to replace with the demons horn.. so Thanks!! :D

0
Posted 01 October 2010 at 14:49

Permalink

ha you commented on another one of my decks dude so yeah i will comment on your deck.again!
hmmm bloodchief's ascension?... i would've gone with demons horn...lol joke.
you could also sideboard a blood seeker or two i guess if your against some heavy creature decks like elves or saprolings or goblins alot of things.lol

0
Posted 02 October 2010 at 16:24

Permalink

Haha! Switch back to demons horn agen.. -_- xD
Yea i got some bloodseekers, i have playd with them, and they are realy anoying for the opponents, but i don't know if i have enough sapce for them..

0
Posted 03 October 2010 at 09:56

Permalink

if nothing else against the types of decks that have alot of creature i'd sub out a pulse tracker or two than you can still get a creature out on turn one but if you don't get pulse tracker you still have bloodchiefs ascension

0
Posted 04 October 2010 at 08:26

Permalink

So you think i should add bloodseekers? I rather not remove any puls trackers. But i could remove the bloodchiefs but that would just be hularios! Haha!

0
Posted 04 October 2010 at 08:30

Permalink

i wouldn't permanantly put them in pulse trackers are really good i'd put a couple in the side board because the blood seekers will do more damage to some types fo decks and might keep them from pulling some of there big moves off like howl of the wolf pack and the like.

0
Posted 04 October 2010 at 08:50

Permalink

Yes i agree! I did that one time. I had a Bloodseeker on the battlefield, and he had to use howl of the wolf pack to have a chance. So he playd the spell, and lost a lot of life. And the one thing he diden't know was that i also had a Marsh Casulties. So the next turn i just kicked it and killed 8 wolfs on one spell, and killed him after that.

0
Posted 04 October 2010 at 09:06

Permalink

yeah blood seeker is nasty against stuff like that which is why hes/she is a decent sideboard situational at the least.

0
Posted 04 October 2010 at 09:07

Permalink

Yes i agree!

0
Posted 04 October 2010 at 10:56

Permalink

if i have any other suggestions i'll be sure to post although i'm not sur a vamp deck can get much better than this.

0
Posted 04 October 2010 at 11:00

Permalink

Thanks! :D

0
Posted 04 October 2010 at 14:30

Permalink

I like the speed and aggro to this deck. Ever thought of running 1 Demon of Death's Gate? That way if you have him early and they can't remove him, it'll be an even faster game... Just an idea... Overall though this deck is great

0
Posted 02 November 2010 at 13:43

Permalink

Wow never tought of that.. But i don't think i'm gonna use it.. My weak creatures becomes realy strong, because they got boost by Captivating vampire and urge to feed. And it would be hard to sacriface 3 creature.. But it is a great idea! Thanks :)

0
Posted 02 November 2010 at 15:58

Permalink

Why are the Vampire Nocturnus's in Sideboard?

0
Posted 21 November 2010 at 18:36

Permalink

I know that Vampire Nocturnus is realy good in my deck, but it has to high mana cost. I would have to take in at least one more mana.. That's why..

0
Posted 24 November 2010 at 07:01

Permalink

Oh, I see. It's just that most vampire decks run four in the main board because he typically wins the game.

0
Posted 02 January 2011 at 11:03

Permalink

Wow… that's all I can say… Wow. Hey man would you mind taking a look at my vampire deck the 3rd :D.
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=121766

0
Posted 08 December 2010 at 17:56

Permalink

i like the child of the night not sue about the lacarators on swap the terrors for either doomblades or feast of the night maybe ???

0
Posted 28 December 2010 at 17:38

Permalink

:)

0
Posted 28 December 2010 at 17:47

Permalink

i like all low mana cost decks liek this and black is the best at it looks well made

0
Posted 28 December 2010 at 18:01

Permalink

Thanks! :)

0
Posted 28 December 2010 at 18:13

Permalink

must run four nighthawks that card is broken... add vampire nocturnus i think youd like that card

0
Posted 05 January 2011 at 09:29

Permalink

oh hey i said id comment if i ever found a card that i thought would do good in your deck so how bout dark tutelage especially with low cost stuff you basically pay one life to draw an extra card

0
Posted 05 January 2011 at 13:57

Permalink

Yea! I have that one, i am using 1 dark tutelage and 1 phyrexian arena, but i have posted 2 phyrexian arena.

0
Posted 13 January 2011 at 06:15

Permalink

ha! i win.

0
Posted 15 January 2011 at 23:57

Permalink

haha!! I would't cal that a win on your side ;)

0
Posted 16 January 2011 at 14:51

Permalink

hey i consider it a win whenever a someone uses my ideas even if they already had them in there deck. lol

0
Posted 17 January 2011 at 21:08

Permalink

U where to late m8! :P

0
Posted 19 January 2011 at 05:23

Permalink

still earlier then everyone else! :P so i still win

0
Posted 20 January 2011 at 16:06

Permalink

Not earlier than me! ;P

0
Posted 21 January 2011 at 20:19

Permalink

id hope not lol although i also do hope >> wait im confusing myself so nevermind xD hey theres a new vampire in the new set did you get a good look at it?

0
Posted 31 January 2011 at 22:46

Permalink

Yeah i saw it, but i don't remember how it was. I think it had to high manacost..

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 05:22

Permalink

its like a 4 cost 4/4 flier with some ability close to megrim i was thinking about it i think four might be a little high for your deck although it is a pretty big guy for 4 for a vampire deck id test him out at least he might be good i think hed be better in your control type deck though cuz hes beafier and more late game like mini baneslayer but a vampire lol

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 10:25

Permalink

Ahh, Cool! Thanks, i shall consider it! :P Mini baneslayer.. Haha! Cool! :P

0
Posted 02 February 2011 at 07:18

Permalink