H0bla

11 Decks, 7 Comments, 0 Reputation

Yeah of course it's like that. I was just thinking that with this setup, cards like Damnation etc could be really devastating and pretty much just ruin your game. It might be good to have a way around them, maybe in side or something.

0
Posted 23 August 2013 at 13:10 in reply to #391245 on NO LANDS!?!?!?

Permalink

One problem with these decks are spells like Damnation, Day of Judgment etc.. I played against my friend who has really fast elf deck, most of the mana came from elfs and he had less than 10 lands. At the beginning he made some damage and got shitload of elfs on table. I just sat there and waited a couple of rounds, got some defence and then boom.. All creatures dead and half of his manapool. Then I played Elixir of Immortality and basically started over with plenty of mana.

0
Posted 23 August 2013 at 12:58 as a comment on NO LANDS!?!?!?

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/card/human-frailty/AVR/ + http://www.mtgvault.com/card/panoptic-mirror/DST/
Maybe include one card that can destroy artifacts and/or enchantments. Counters might be a good idea too?

0
Posted 06 June 2013 at 09:16 as a comment on Standard Humans

Permalink

I have seen it but not sure if I put it in this deck. I know there's too little mana. However, the over all mana cost of most cards is low. If I get Crypt Ghast in battlefield and no one destroys it right away it's doubling my mana pool. If Ghast gets destoyed too easily I can always add Darksteel Plate and/or Whispersilk Cloak in my deck for protection. Anyway, this deck is work in progress. I always make decks close to 80 cards in them and play a few games. After that it's easier to say which cards are not usefull and which are. So after few games my deck size is reduced closer to 60. Thank you for the tip by the way!

0
Posted 29 May 2013 at 16:41 in reply to #358329 on Discard'ish?

Permalink

Layout will change. Actually, already did.. :)

0
Posted 13 May 2013 at 23:39 as a comment on Discard'ish (work in progress)

Permalink