Burn you twice....Revised

by gwd1096 on 23 January 2011

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Sorceries (3)


Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

This is a faster and lighter version of my Burn you twice.... shame on me deck:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=138387
Comments are welcome and tell me what you think about it
Thanks for all the support guys! This is the first of my decks thats made it to the front page so thanks again!

Deck Tags

  • Burn

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

10
Likes

This deck has been viewed 2,196 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

000570

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Burn you twice....Revised

Why did you take out Arc Trail though?
I thought that was a petty good card. The act of treason card is an ok card tactically, but arc trail is I believe a petty good alternative. Maybe just put that on the side board if your still iffy about Arc trails.

But its still good. Elemental Appeal is a fun card when you have 9 mana on the field :D
Good one mate

0
Posted 23 January 2011 at 11:21

Permalink

I like arc trail but its a sorcery. i prefer instants i put in 4 burst lightning instead. and i like elemental appeal when you have a reverberate or two in your hand

0
Posted 23 January 2011 at 13:44

Permalink

i would use seething song x 4 in this deck dude just to speed up more

0
Posted 23 January 2011 at 12:07

Permalink

would be a great card but unfortunately its not standard

0
Posted 23 January 2011 at 13:47

Permalink

I am a huge fan of red direct damage, I take it to the point of no creatures in a direct damage deck. what do you do with protection from red, or a c.o.p. red ?

0
Posted 23 January 2011 at 13:15

Permalink

the cop red isnt in standard anymore so all i have to worry about is the protection from red and brave the elements type cards. and in that case deal face damage to the player fast

0
Posted 23 January 2011 at 13:47

Permalink

I like it. Very much dmg in a shor time. I'd maybe add 3 Pyroclasms to the sideboard, so you won't have any problems with opponents creatures anytime (when comet storm would be too expensive to kill all of them - conquerors pledge for example). Also check out my 'Flames and Offending!' deck.
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=138514
Cheers!

0
Posted 23 January 2011 at 13:39

Permalink

i like pyroclasm but it would kill my kiln fiend which can get pretty big when you start a nice stack of spells and its a sorcery. other than that though i thank its a solid card. thanks for the comments guys!

0
Posted 23 January 2011 at 13:54

Permalink

Boristopheles has deleted this comment.

Posted 23 January 2011 at 14:48

Permalink

i use the mountains to trigger the valakuts so i need them i would consider them if i had something with landfall though

0
Posted 23 January 2011 at 14:52

Permalink

Boristopheles has deleted this comment.

Posted 23 January 2011 at 15:08

Permalink

well the thing is why have one of those two sac/fetch lands that gives you a land into play tapped when you can simply have the same chances of drawing a basic land that comes into play untapped and ready to use

0
Posted 23 January 2011 at 17:54

Permalink

Boristopheles has deleted this comment.

Posted 23 January 2011 at 23:17

Permalink

i see where your coming from on how they slim your deck down and i think ill give it a try with proxies since im still not sold on the whole come into play tapped thing

0
Posted 25 January 2011 at 00:48

Permalink

why dont you just use fetchlands like scalding tarn or arid mesa then so you they come into play untapped?

0
Posted 26 January 2011 at 09:35

Permalink

i would if i had any, but i dont and i dont have $30 laying around to go buy 3 lol

0
Posted 26 January 2011 at 19:31

Permalink

Boristopheles has deleted this comment.

Posted 23 January 2011 at 14:57

Permalink

So I built your deck on mtgo online and i'm loving it. right now I'm running 5/1. woot!!

0
Posted 28 January 2011 at 16:45

Permalink

good to hear this deck works for other people besides me :)

Thanks for the comments guys!

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 14:21

Permalink

just out of curiosity... is mtgo free? :O

if so, could you please send me a link? :)

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 14:47

Permalink

from what i hear you have to buy your deck online. via the website and make your deck that way online, but if you get a complete set they give you the option of getting the full set that you bought in physical form but if you do this then you loose all the virtual copies

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 15:23

Permalink

Kind of slow and a lot of your spells are pretty high mana cost, but I do like a couple of spells in the deck. Comment on my Burn/Control Deck if you have time. Thanks

0
Posted 28 January 2011 at 23:58

Permalink

Im debating on dropping out the Cerebral Eruption from this deck which is on sideboard for big creature decks, and replacing them with something else. In your opinion whats a good cheap spell thats in standard that i might have missed?

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 14:23

Permalink

why not 2 chandra ablaze?

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 14:25

Permalink

i figured i just give you a little push to the front page ;)

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 14:25

Permalink

Thanks man! And as far as Chandra goes i like having one of each because there abilities differ. and nalaar is cheaper than ablaze, but other than that no reason.

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 14:33

Permalink

fling is asking to be in this deck it seems

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 21:03

Permalink

i agree it would be nasty to play after stacking up a fiend and attacking, but what you propose that i take out?

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 22:42

Permalink