hi, the deck looks cool to play but you do not have creatures enought and without them is hard for you to win. I don't know how you use Consume the meek, but perhaps you can add some creatures like, coralhelm commander (personaly I like it), reckless scholar (draw advantage), Kathari remnant (good defender with regenerate and cascad) or Nemesis of Reason... or even cunning sparkmage. there are a lot of good creatures that you can use. --------------------------------------- Comment my decks too ;)
Permalink
hmm I must agree with you about kaleido and knight... I've made some changes, took off kaleido, knight and 1 garruk's companion, and added 3 cunning sparkmage (agree with your suggestion) and 4 goblin ruinblaster, 2 hasty creatures able to some damage (I hope). I've not tested enought already, but what do you say about the changes? thanks for comment :)
thanks for the suggestion :) have sure I'll try
what about some fetch lands? replace jungle shrine for 2 arid mesa and a verdant catacombs?
hmm ye :S a little. But it worked almost everytime until now. however, I'v already thought to replace 1 rootbound crag and the swamp for 2 savage lands. what do you say? thanks for comment :)
I guess I can make some changes, sideboard spellbreaker to play against blue-control and mainboard mycoid. what do you say? have any other suggestion about this? thanks for comment ;)
hi, I guess your wrong about Fog vs. Destructive force because destructive force deals "damage" and Fog only protects my creatures from "combat damage". About Nature's spiral, I can consider it. I'll test it better with that card to see how many nature's spiral I can mainboard ;) Thanks for the advices.
This deck sounds fun to play. I think you should try to use liliana's caress. I mean, 2nd turn, liliana's caress, 3rd turn underworld dreams and then each of you burning inquiry deals 9 damage and you still having a full power runflare trap. Truly I like this style of deck ;) ------------------------------------- Comment my decks too
hi, this deck sounds good, but you'll have some problems with the greater creaturesl. Once earthquake has rotateed out you can play pyroclasm instead.You can play with hourney to nowhere or searing blaze instead of punishing fire, that could help to handle with some creatures. I don't know if you can easly have some turns without losing life but if you can, perhaps its a good idea to try luminarch ascension, what can increase your deck agressiveness a little or you can even try Warmonger's Chariot. You can try to play with Kazuul tyrant of the cliffs once you can force the opponent creatures to attack or predator dragon to a surprise final attack (devouring phoenix probably opens your way to opponents life points). To sideboard you can play some condemn or celestial purge, Kor firewalker (against burn), Dispeller's Capsule. Perhaps fight to the death... or intimidation bolt. Its quite dificult give considerable suggestions to keep the cost lower than 50€, but I'v tried :P, I hope some this could give you some ideas. ----------------------------------------- Comment my decks too ;)
hi, I understand the main idea, but that strategy is too risky. because you opponent's will ever have a removal or bouncing card, or even enchantment destruction and your spellbase do not looks like that much solid. In base thats a "slowly burn" strategy, so you should protect yourself better from other creatures and be ready to protect the enchanted creature from your opponent too. So, if I were you, I would play 4 cards of each your lightning bolts and flame slash and also 4 or at least 3 mana leak, deprive, preordain and tresure's hunt. You also can mainboard the swerve because your opponent will try to play removal on his own creature for sure, so you will be able to change the target to anothe creature he controls or even to him (if it is burn) and replace that sideboard slots with 4 Sleep. It may sounds like I'm telling you to change the whole deck, but I'm just giving a suggestion about how to make it more consistent. ----------------------------------- Comment my decks too
hi, I like the idea, that Titan mixed with Monument looks really good. On the other hand I do not like much Omnath. Its a good card, well, it looks like but in the pratic you'll be spending mana production for that card, instead of playing something more useful and it will ever be an easy target to removal cards (and then you lose all the acumulated mana almost for sure). So I think you could replace the omnath, canopy or gelatinous slots for maelstorm pulse because doomblade is uneffective agains black. And you can also replace the Sorin slots for 2 more mitotic slimes. If you can play a 3 turn gaea's, you can also play a 3 turn mitotic and it sounds good to me too because your opponent will probably lose a land, his second or third and you'll get some advantage. ---------------------------------------------- Comment my decks too ;)
hi, I agree with hipponox about toshiro and doomblade, perhaps you can try to reduce to 3 or 2 toshiro and replace doomblade for unmake or even for mortify(awesome card). You can also reduce the number of devoted retainer's, I don't this that it will be that much usefull to you after the 3rd or 4th turns so... unless of course you play something like coat of arms once you have 24 samurai cratures. ho, and you can always sideboard some painter's servant to make your any of your "hands" immune to all your opponent creatures and targeting spells :P
thanks for comment ;). I'v never thought about hydra to this deck because a made it a long time ago but I'll try to play the khalni hydra instead of hellkite overlord, and then I can play a full roll of forests 21 forest and add some blanchwood armors. what do you think?
Hi, I really do like the main idea of your deck and I usually use that kind of strategy so let me make some suggestions :) First, I do not like consuming vapors that much. You have 8 cards to control your opponent's creatures (maelstorm and doom) but you will never be able to have full control of your opponents deck (if it's good enought) to isolate the creatures you really want him to sacrifice. At least not in medium/late game and consuming costs 4 so you cannot even combo it that easly. So you will only get a sacrifice of dispensable creatures. I would suggest to play smother instead or some discard card like inquisition of kozilek so you can send a creature card to the grave that you can easly return to your field. Once you're using fauna shaman, I guess you do not need 4 exemplars of vengivine, and the same for bloodgast. In there I would prefer to play a set of 2/3 of each of them (perhaps 2 vengivine and 3 bloodgast) and get some putrid leech in. thats a 2 cmc creature that can hold well in medium on even late game. and also makes a good combo with vines of vastwood (attacking with an 8/8 creature in the second turn seems good to me :-P). I hope this comment could help ----------------------------------------------- Comment my decks too
hi, perhaps you could use some chandra's spitfire instead of earth servant for example and some other cards. Once you have that much burn cards this could be a good card and also it can make a good combo with fling, just see the idea: 3rd turn- play chandra's spitfire, 4th turn- in the best case play 2 lightning bolts (6) and attack with spitfire (7) and then you fling spitefire (7). so you can deal 6+7+7=20 damage points in your 4th turn. but this is just in the best case.
Glad to help ;)
Hi, I think you should play with Kalastria Highborn and since you have some life recovering perhaps play with Sign in Blood. And you could also change vampire hexmage to sideboard and play bloodthrone vampire instead as f4113nx said, because it would combo well with blade and kalastria. Just think about that ;)
Hi, I understand your decks idea, but I do not have sure if it works that much good as it is actually. First of all I think you should play with just 60. I think you should think well about "what cards you really need everymatch" and not in "what cards you need sometimes" and focus on them. For example, joraga could be usefull for you, yes it could, but just in late game so you will have mana enought to kick it well. I would take it away if I were you. Another thing is the spells you use to deal with damage and creatures... you should play spells with a smaller converted mana cost and perhaps you should use Fog instead of safe passage because it costs just 1 green mana. to play. And I also think that you should focus on one of this creatures only: Mul Daya or Oracle of Mul Daya. If I were you I would use 3 or 4 Oracles of Mul Daya. And think about playing with one or 2 martial coup to use has last resouce if your opponent deck starts beeing too much agressive. to your sideboar, since it looks like your using just cheap cards, my advice is: 3 Silence (Good to make an opponent lose one turn of action: anti combo and control) 4 autumn's Veil (against control-counter base decks and also could be good agains jund/monoblack removals) 4 Celestial Purge (awsome agains jund and MonoBlack) 4 Naturalize I hope I'v helped ------------------------------------ Gews on the board! Comment my decks too.
hi, nice deck idea ;). I'v already tryed something similar to that and it works. In that case I think you should try some changes like: -2 gideon, and replace for 1 more Negate (to adjust the amount of cards to 60). And I think you should try to play some Treasure Hunt because it really helps in decks with the amount of mana that you have to get faster the cards you need (in this case, SoLA). But this are just some sugestions ;) --------------------------------------------- Gews on the board! Comment my decks too