Silent Unlife

by Gentlejackjones on 01 July 2014

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (19 cards)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Take Naturalize x 1, add Disenchant

Deck Tags

  • Legacy Legal

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

2
Likes

This deck has been viewed 588 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

1400821

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Silent Unlife

Seems ok, dont think id be able to play it though...care to add a description??

0
Posted 01 July 2014 at 21:09

Permalink

Yeah, sometimes these decks are uber confusing when they don't leave descriptions.

From what I can gather the key card is:
Phyrexian Unlife.
He is using it to pump the hell out of stuff like Moltensteel Dragon. Or at least I see that as a Win Condition. And if that is the only win condition, he needs to add 2 or 3 more Moltensteel Dragons or 2 or 3 more Zeniths to get the Dragon in his hand.

I don't know what else is going on...but he seems to have a weird choose for a few of his creatures. And he seems to have added Melira for no reason...unless a lot of his friends use infect/poison.

0
Posted 01 July 2014 at 21:33

Permalink

Crap, crap, I missed it.

Necrumlsice, look at the second part of Phyrexian Unlife!
"As long as you have 0 or less life, all damage is dealt to you as though its source had infect."

What he is doing, and where I am dumb and my last comment needs to be down-voted, is using Melira and Phyrexian Unlife together. Melira says he can't have poison counters, and Unlife is telling him that damage below 0 counts as poison counters.

Very nasty, my friend.

Take out the Hound for something like Platinum Angel or Soul Conduit!

1
Posted 01 July 2014 at 21:39

Permalink

oh, wow...this is nasty..... Thanks dude!

0
Posted 01 July 2014 at 21:42

Permalink

I would take out the Tanadon for the Dragons. You can pay infinite, i guess, to pump up the Dragons.
Unless, i am missing something (I probably am), the Dragon is 10x better in this deck versus Tanadon.

Why is the Thunder Spirit and Hound in here? I see the Castle combos with the Hound...but it isn't that great. Again, I am probably missing something.

0
Posted 01 July 2014 at 21:47

Permalink

Thanks, Necrumslice and Jessie, for your comments above.

I was originally using Thunder Spirits and the Hound as mana-efficient aggro foils until I could establish the lock, but I think I agree with the thought that more M. Dragons would be more efficient and uni-directional for the deck.

As for Dragons over Tanadon, I agree with you Jessie. I need to saddle up and order some more from SCG or somewhere. Maybe the final version should be 4 dragons, 4 tanadons, and 4 ohran vipers for defense? Or sub out Vipers for Forcefield... hmm...

Also, sorry for not placing a description, etc. I'm new to the site, but am learning.

0
Posted 02 July 2014 at 00:24

Permalink

I definitely liked it!

0
Posted 02 July 2014 at 00:52

Permalink