ganderzero

3 Decks, 14 Comments, 0 Reputation

chandra ablaze.....

0
Posted 14 March 2010 at 00:30 as a comment on Burn ! Burn ! Burn !

Permalink

nice, make sure you add 100 more islands so that you can run Battle of Witts.

0
Posted 14 March 2010 at 00:19 as a comment on Faerie In-Your-Face Control

Permalink

lol i thought your alternate wincon was goblin assault. oh well, its your deck anyway =]. you should consider some iona shield of emerias in the deck. most players scoop as soon as they see an iona come into play unanswered.

0
Posted 14 March 2010 at 00:13 in reply to #56559 on Polymorph

Permalink

i dont know why there is a single celestial colonnade in there, but yeah its pretty solid

0
Posted 14 March 2010 at 00:10 as a comment on Polymorph

Permalink

you might need some tutors to get more rats onto the field *sarcasm*

0
Posted 14 March 2010 at 00:08 as a comment on You-know-who Rats

Permalink

well if baneslayer is a threat, so is iona shield of emeria and admonition angel. why not run all three and call it a naya beat down instead of a so called, "token" deck. You are like the retards that call their deck jund when they dont even run any bloodbraid elf, pulses, or sprouting thrinax.

0
Posted 14 March 2010 at 00:05 in reply to #56459 on GW tokens

Permalink

sage owl, yes, but unsummon is a no. his goal is to put cards back on top of the deck so that the opponent makes no progress in top decking anything. the deck needs 4 treasure hunts, because they practically are staples in any blue deck, and 4 sphinx as finishers, because he cant bounce everything.

0
Posted 13 March 2010 at 12:45 in reply to #56426 on Bounce

Permalink

wouldnt be much of a token deck if you are running KotR or BS angel

0
Posted 13 March 2010 at 12:41 as a comment on GW tokens

Permalink

its not fail you idiot. seeing that he is running 1 or 2 of every card means that its a budget casual deck that probably relies on booster packs to fuel it. its just like saying that you fail for not running 4 tarmogoyfs in a green deck, or running 4 baneslayers in a white deck.

0
Posted 13 March 2010 at 12:37 in reply to #56425 on Gred

Permalink

needs 4 quest for renewal, im not kidding, people look down upon quest for renewal, but what they dont realize is that your creatures untap ever single untap phase, even on your opponent's. thats practically giving all your creatures vigilance for 2 cost. you can get an active quest for renewal in 2 turns if you have 2 creatures on the board.

0
Posted 13 March 2010 at 12:30 as a comment on Beast Deck, please comment

Permalink

needs 4 quest for renewal, im not kidding, people look down upon quest for renewal, but what they dont realize is that your creatures untap ever single untap phase, even on your opponent's. thats practically giving all your creatures vigilance for 2 cost. you can get an active quest for renewal in 2 turns if you have 2 creatures on the board.

0
Posted 13 March 2010 at 12:28 as a comment on Green Beatdown

Permalink

it might be good to include bituminous blast or those red creature control.

0
Posted 12 March 2010 at 01:46 as a comment on No Mercy

Permalink

this deck looks like valakut ramp gone stupid. this is just way too slow. valakut is slow if you dont have ramp. hellkite wont see the light of day unless you use ramp, or dragonstorm. this deck will never see a creature on the field until turn 3 (a weak little 2/1 ruin blaster dies to any token or creature), and even then, there's a chance you could get mana screwed. also, i understand that you will attempt to use burn to stabilize the field, but you'll end up losing card advantage over your opponent. just play valakut ramp, you'll be better off there than here.

0
Posted 10 March 2010 at 00:02 as a comment on Red Control

Permalink

add some llanowar elves

0
Posted 09 March 2010 at 23:56 as a comment on BEAST MODE!!!(First Draft)

Permalink