Who Says Control Needs Blue?

by Faidtastic on 23 October 2009

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

All of my decks tend to be based off of expensive combos and so I fall often to fast decks that throw out creatures on the field faster than I can deal with it.

Thus this deck; creature control. I was also trying to show those I play with that you don't need a blue deck to control a large aspect of the game.

A lot of people I play with like to /flex about their indestructible creatures and such and so I figured I'd show them that that's not that great if you have to sacrifice them. :P

Casual play only. Only real issue is killer non-creature artifacts and enchantments.

Most creature control comes from the Instants and Sorceries to make them sac their own creatures; for large numbers (Ewww weenie decks) there's Death Pits of Rath + Screams of the Damned or Tremor; most damage to the player via Consume Spirit and Grab the Reins.

Deck Tags

  • Creatureless

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 1,345 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0033120

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Who Says Control Needs Blue?

not enough win conditions. id add a very few fast creatures like malfegor or if you dont run any other creatures you cold run rakdos the defiler.

0
Posted 23 October 2009 at 16:32

Permalink

But then I'd just have to sac it to Innocent Blood.

0
Posted 23 October 2009 at 17:56

Permalink