[Casual] Burning Metal

by exodd1994 on 13 May 2013

Main Deck (60 cards)

Artifacts (8)


Land (17)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

A mono-red artifact burn.

How to Play

Summon lots of artifacts and burn your opponent down quickly. Dangerous wager for draw.

Deck Tags

  • Budget
  • Red
  • Burn
  • Casual
  • Artifact

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

2
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,062 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

000230

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for [Casual] Burning Metal

Honestly, I bet you could safely go down to 18, maybe even 16 lands and feel relatively no effect! This is an awesome idea. I love it!

0
Posted 13 May 2013 at 04:22

Permalink

Thank you very much for your comments! Would it be possible for you to advise me on the cards I would add in exchange for reducing the land count? Thank you!

1
Posted 13 May 2013 at 15:37

Permalink

Sure, I'll throw some ideas out there. :)

I feel like some card draw would be good for your deck, because you're basically gonna dump your hand at the start and have nowhere else to go... Dangerous Wager can give you basically two free cards if you play it right.

If you don't like that, maybe consider adding in Goblin Bushwhacker! Imagine on turn one, you drop a Mountain and play 2 Memnites, an Ornithopter, and on their turn you burn them for 4 with Galvanic Blast. Then turn two rolls around and you drop Goblin Bushwhacker kicked, and suddenly you're swinging for 7 and they've already lost half of their life! Seems pretty nice to me. What do you think?

0
Posted 13 May 2013 at 21:32

Permalink

You are very right! It might be better to replace Embersmith with him though.

1
Posted 14 May 2013 at 01:14

Permalink

I still think you could go down a couple lands, but I guess having extra land never really hurt anyone in Casual :)

0
Posted 14 May 2013 at 03:02

Permalink

Sorry to spam your comments, but take a look at Whipflare! I think you could safely take 2 lands out and replace it with 2 Whipflare for removal, because it wouldn't target your own creatures (other than Goblin Bushwhacker, which you would play AFTER a Whipflare anyway)!

0
Posted 14 May 2013 at 08:58

Permalink

Thank you very much for your help! I seriously need to get to know more cards. That's a great card for this deck!

1
Posted 15 May 2013 at 14:06

Permalink