Kithkin Rush

by EternalDragon on 21 November 2007

Main Deck (42 cards)

Instants (4)


Enchantments (4)


Land (20)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

A Mono-White Kithkin Agro Deck.
My perfect game will be turn one Stalwart, trun two Meadowgrain, turn three Avian, turn four Two Wizened Cenns. Theres nothing like swinging for Twelve on turn four with what would seem like threatless Kithkin.

Deck Tags

  • Weenie

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,085 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

320000

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Not Legal in Vintage
  • Not Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Kithkin Rush

Your perfect hand should infact be 1rst stalwart, 2nd wizened cenn. Now you have a 3/3 on turn two. The Building on a Budget guy from magicthegathering.com made an excellent Kithkin deck with full experimentations. Since you have 4 Greathearts and only 2 Giants, wouldn't Runed Stalactite be a good equipment for the team?

0
Posted 21 November 2007 at 16:19

Permalink

Oh, and no way 19 is a correct amount of land for anything short of a sligh deck. Check Ben's Blenstein (sp?)'s article.

0
Posted 21 November 2007 at 16:20

Permalink

Turn two cenn is not bad, but to get maximum damage by turn four, which is about when this deck begins to see confrontation, dropping swingers then buffing them is my best play. The Greathearts do need giants, but thats why i have the Avians, that and there good evasion damage that get buffed by my Cenns.

As far as land go's I have had great success playing at 19. I had doubts at first but so long as I have land three by turn three I'm golden, and I usually start with at least two in hand.

0
Posted 21 November 2007 at 16:30

Permalink

Gotta Side with Madrock on this one. 19 lands is definitely not enough for this deck. I wouls lose Brigid and the Giants for 3 more lands, 22 should work quite nicely for this deck. But other than that, this deck is a pretty solid one. Comment my Nantuko Husk please!

-Bassman

0
Posted 24 November 2007 at 05:38

Permalink

really nice deck.
check out my deck also at:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=130863

0
Posted 03 January 2011 at 09:15

Permalink