Etherium Control

by enragedmg5 on 13 September 2009

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Esper Shard Artifacts that build eachother up and also has Canonist for maximum control.

Deck Tags

  • Artifact

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,086 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

17371600

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Etherium Control

looks solid - I'm assuming this is a big scary smash-in-the-enemies-face deck. here's my opinion.
take out the windright mages. take out the sen triplets. add some court homunculus.
instead of the 4 island, 3 plains, and 3 swamp have 4 seat of the synod, 3 ancient den, and 3 vault of whispers.
if you want more control, even if you don't, add 4 Ethersworn canonist.
also look at absord / undermine.

please give me feedback - http://mtgvault.com/Profile.aspx?UserID=16875

0
Posted 13 September 2009 at 13:01

Permalink

add some spot removal (path to exile) and pacifism and as Boris mentioned add the artifact lands + get rid of rupture spires they're really for four or five colour decks.
m10 dual alnds are good as well

0
Posted 13 September 2009 at 13:11

Permalink

The other artifact lands are only legal in extended, and his deck appears to be all standard cards. If not I am sure he would have used cards from Mirrodin. Deck looks good to me, I would maybe change the spells and take some of the multi- colored lands out for 4 Obelisk of Esper, since they are artifacts they will boost up Master of Etherium as well. I would also maybe change out Sharuum for Sphinx Sovereign/ Sphinx Summoner.

0
Posted 13 September 2009 at 14:03

Permalink