ElfSadras

21 Decks, 20 Comments, 1 Reputation

Devil's Play a la place de Volcanic Geyser. Ou encore moins cher, je mettrais 2 x Pillar of Flame

0
Posted 08 May 2013 at 05:03 in reply to #349149 on Gruul

Permalink

si jamais tu as un extra a mettre, un bon combo c'est Burning-Tree Emissary avec Lightning Mauler, 3 ou 4 de chaque, tu peux remplacer certaines créatures, et enlever le seul enchantement que tu as. 1 enchantement dans un deck fera pas de différence et tu le trouveras toujours ennuyant

0
Posted 08 May 2013 at 05:00 in reply to #349149 on Gruul

Permalink

Hmm je trouves que tu as trop de creatures qui coutent 4 et + à sortir. je mettrait au moins 14-15 creatures qui coutent 2-3, les plus grosses créatures je garderais ceux qui ont un effet gruul de discard. Mettrait 2 Planewalker domri. 10 forest 10 mountain. Si tu as + de Zhur-Taa Swine et Slaughterhorn, 4 ca serait bien a cause de leur abilité. Skarrg Guildmage cest bon aussi, 2 comme tu as cest bien.

0
Posted 08 May 2013 at 02:40 in reply to #349149 on Gruul

Permalink

Cool Je Vais Regarder Ca ce soir

0
Posted 07 May 2013 at 12:54 as a comment on Gruul

Permalink

Made challenges today after a FNM

0
Posted 16 February 2013 at 03:02 as a comment on simic std. Need HELP

Permalink

look at mine if you can take some of my ideas. http://www.mtgvault.com/elfsadras/decks/rb-rakdos-std-advices-welcome/

0
Posted 07 February 2013 at 00:21 as a comment on Rakados

Permalink

pretty solid imho have you played it yet ?

-2
Posted 21 January 2013 at 05:54 in reply to #317592 on w/U exalted enchantment

Permalink

pretty cool and cheap deck, Have you played it yet at fnm or in any standard tournament?

0
Posted 21 January 2013 at 05:34 as a comment on Scientific Experiments

Permalink

Keep us inform of your performances

0
Posted 21 January 2013 at 05:21 as a comment on R/B Aggro-Standard

Permalink

It depends a lot against what type of deck your playing imho, right now the deck have 40% creature, 40% mana, 20% sorc. you can change that with the SB im using to boost your spells or creatures. If the game become longer you still have a response with increasing vengeance and chandra. For now i find it useful to put in 4 pillar of flame, and reducing the big creatures so that way you get rid of early creature and let you build a more all around good red/black deck

0
Posted 21 January 2013 at 05:02 in reply to #317385 on RB Rakdos STD, advices welcome

Permalink

hey thanks for your comment, I think that Hellkite is too expensive for that deck but would certainly be good !

0
Posted 16 January 2013 at 00:19 in reply to #316540 on RB Rakdos STD, advices welcome

Permalink

Venerable (509) Jestrix thanks for your comment, I took your advices! Ive tried my deck against a modern black deck and truly hellsteed was pushing me back. Lobber Crew will surely help me defend and like you said will help me get this Lord of Riots out faster. I changed my SB so I think i will be able to respond a bit better.

Your comment is rly appreciated.

0
Posted 16 January 2013 at 00:17 in reply to #316544 on RB Rakdos STD, advices welcome

Permalink

rly like it, I am curious about how your game against Thragtusk went. Do you think you could have played better, or was the Thragtusk deck rly better.

0
Posted 10 January 2013 at 18:29 as a comment on A Cat and its Staff

Permalink

I might add bigger creatures on my SB and dreadbore in case facing more midrange

0
Posted 08 January 2013 at 04:22 in reply to #314680 on RB Rakdos STD, advices welcome

Permalink

Hey, thanks again, I already have those vexing devil so i might be looking for 2xStonewright and 2xSlumbering Dragon to replace those Stromkirk Noble. Reckless Waif are on my sideboard for now so I think this deck would prolly be good to compete

0
Posted 08 January 2013 at 04:21 in reply to #314680 on RB Rakdos STD, advices welcome

Permalink

Thanks again, I changed some things, added a BR creature with a high Colorless cost but can sync well with Rakdos, took off 2 Increasing vengeance to put 2 searing spear. Finally I removed Dreadbore to put Chandra. I think this way, enough creature will be able to be on the table and nasty burn with Chandra duplicating, like Increasing vengeance.

0
Posted 07 January 2013 at 23:50 in reply to #314680 on RB Rakdos STD, advices welcome

Permalink

Hey Ty for your comment, didnt realized about akroma, so I changed for 2 fervors, and changed a bit my sideboard, I think it does better this way right nowm what do you think ?

0
Posted 07 January 2013 at 05:38 in reply to #314680 on RB Rakdos STD, advices welcome

Permalink

Hey, thanks commenting, I rly want to keep this in standard version so i wont put anger but will look for ash zealot

0
Posted 07 January 2013 at 04:31 in reply to #314690 on RB Rakdos STD, advices welcome

Permalink

I think Mycosynth Lattice plays against you in this deck, you give the chance to your opponent to benefits everything you have when combined with Confusion in the ranks

0
Posted 02 January 2013 at 18:16 as a comment on Wtf is happening right now?

Permalink