Thanks a bunch from the both of you, I'm just coming back to magic from a little time off and had no clue about the rules change. Disappointing to hear, but better to hear now than in an event. I'm going to head back for more playtesting before making changes here, but thank you again for the advice, it is much appreciated.
Permalink
the point of the deck was to use artificers intuition to find what i needed, as a toolbox-style deck, but with playtesting it didn't work so well
Sacrifice pyrite spellbomb 10 times
"most of the costly elements" haha it's a $50 deck, but thank you. To answer you question, you often get very close to killing yourself but it's usually manageable, but the worst match up for this deck is definitely burn and other aggro decks.
Tiny Peasant is a mix of Peasant commander and tiny leaders, so it's common and uncommon and nonlegendary commanders are legal
No, this is for a format called tiny peasant, it it like tiny leaders but common and uncommon only, and the command can be any common or uncommon creature ( doesn't have to be a lengend)
I greatly approve of this, thank you
What would be your recommendation against opposing creature decks?
He's a 2/1 warrior for 1, that's good enough for me.
That's the idea, the other win con i forgot to mention is to simply make the opponent concede.
Thanks for the suggestion, Paradox haze is an awesome addition which i never thought of, thanks!
Yes, i do!Also, thanks.
No, i think that peasant is commons and a maximum of 5 uncommons, not any number of uncommons, but thank you anyway
That's actually a pretty awesome addition, i decided to keep the four hivelords and dropped the bonescyths to 1, the constricting to 1, and the syphon to 1.
awesome, never considered that. I may keep the four of hivelord because it is just so good, but i will find a way to run the four chords.
Thank you, thats actually a pretty cool addition
sorry after doing some more research i found this:http://www.reddit.com/r/magicTCG/comments/29oezh/matt_tabak_confirms_the_chain_veil_does_go/i take back what i said before
I love your deck and it's really cool but im sorry to say that i believe that your infinite combo does not work.Chain veil reads:"For each planeswalker you control, you may activate one of its loyalty abilities once this turn as though none of its loyalty abilities have been activated this turn."I think that the line : "one of its loyalty abilities once this turn" means that you cannot activate the planeswalker's ability again even if you activate the chain veil again.please correct me if i am wrong.
Bears tribal: http://www.mtgvault.com/dragonlord10001/decks/long-live-the-bear-king/
Thanks, i just put in the two you suggested, i normally just run the cards i can think of fairly easily without thinking too hard.
1-20 of 41 items