Double The Fire power!Standard

by dragon77 on 01 October 2014

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (13 cards)

Creatures (4)


Sorceries (4)

Instants (5)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Double strike sandard

Deck Tags

  • Standard
  • Double strike
  • Fun

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

22
Likes

This deck has been viewed 4,084 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0003215

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Double The Fire power!Standard

R/G agggro!

This should be given to any new player!

Great starter deck!

+1

1
Posted 02 October 2014 at 00:21

Permalink

Thanks i been playing for a awhile , but i wanted to try a double strike R/G Aggro idea , and see what happens this is the idea/shell of what i wanna do, thanks for all the tips

0
Posted 02 October 2014 at 13:03

Permalink

Well it seems like an ok deck, the only thing you will have to worry about it card draw!

Id put in dragon mantle (putting two in, -1 punch and -1 become immense) seeing as it works SOO well with the twins... ALSO if you cut one heir to the winds and one war name you could put in two rattle-claw mystic?

She is a decent attacker as a 2/1 but also can ramp you from 3-4 manna making you get to your twins faster, and allowing you to strike/jet and play a creature on turn 3.

Hope any of this helps... :3

If you get stuck message northy on one of his old decks.

0
Posted 02 October 2014 at 15:55

Permalink

The mystics are good, but elvish mystic may be better for what i wanna do ! Made changes

0
Posted 02 October 2014 at 19:11

Permalink

Rattleclaw fits a bit better in this deck. For one more mana you're getting another mana fix, R/G. Instead of just the G from Elvish. You're also getting a 2/2. More damage and mana possibilities.

1
Posted 03 October 2014 at 17:40

Permalink

I completely agree!

0
Posted 03 October 2014 at 19:07

Permalink

2/1 * My b

0
Posted 03 October 2014 at 19:08

Permalink

Hmm ... one could call on my old friend burning-tree shaman. Yes, I know she doesn't have ramp ... but she does mana fix pretty well. You get RG, and a 2/2 body to boot. Kinda like mana pulse.

0
Posted 03 October 2014 at 19:12

Permalink

Burning tree emissary? She rotated out of standard when Khan's came in.

0
Posted 03 October 2014 at 19:26

Permalink

Double drat! I guess the mystic is our best shot.

0
Posted 03 October 2014 at 19:35

Permalink

And you mean she WILL rotate out.

0
Posted 03 October 2014 at 19:36

Permalink

I will have to get a couple rattleclaw then , i see what you mean , Thank for all the help Knight, northy, moonwolf and whoever else i missed, just what to take out for them

0
Posted 03 October 2014 at 20:53

Permalink

Happy to help!

0
Posted 04 October 2014 at 02:14

Permalink

Add 4 copies of Awaken the Bear to the maindeck. Doublestrikeys surely need some trample.

0
Posted 02 October 2014 at 19:16

Permalink

Maybe move the revoker to sideboard then ? How does the rest look for a deck

0
Posted 02 October 2014 at 20:31

Permalink

Man ... this is freaking awesome! Good work.

Deus of Calamity, Kinsbaile Cavalier, Boros Switchblade, and Silverblade Paladin are proud of you!

0
Posted 03 October 2014 at 02:37

Permalink

Thanks , i tried to look for a different idea then the goblins and other ideas out there , the only thing iss i took the dragon style twins and become immense and made my own deck around it

0
Posted 03 October 2014 at 02:44

Permalink

Well, nice work.

0
Posted 03 October 2014 at 04:20

Permalink

Nice, as a lover of double strike and gruul you make both of them proud, one suggestion maybe 1 of Xenagod?

0
Posted 03 October 2014 at 15:54

Permalink

Titan's Strength maybe?

0
Posted 04 October 2014 at 21:20

Permalink

Should i put in these Monastery Swiftspear and take out War-Name Aspirant

0
Posted 04 October 2014 at 23:09

Permalink

I like Aspirant, but you do have a lot of instants ...

0
Posted 04 October 2014 at 23:14

Permalink

15 , so until i play a few games with the deck i won't know..lol

0
Posted 05 October 2014 at 00:40

Permalink

Looks pretty good. I had a similar idea but focused mainly on the Flamespeaker.
Check mine out for some more ideas: http://www.mtgvault.com/mradam5/decks/flamespeaker/

0
Posted 06 October 2014 at 00:19

Permalink

Thanks , Whats your thoughts on Swiftspear vs the war creature ?

0
Posted 06 October 2014 at 02:00

Permalink

I think War-Name is a better creature here. Its a permanent bonus that will likely happen in this type of deck, versus a temp buff that sometimes happens. War-Name also works great with the Flamespeaker; if shes the card you exile with him, you cast her in and will get her bonus.
Her second ability is also some pretty good evasion against token decks.
I feel Swiftspear would work better in a U/R deck.

0
Posted 06 October 2014 at 02:45

Permalink

Thanks for the opinion, i was on the fence

1
Posted 06 October 2014 at 03:07

Permalink

wat duz this deck specilize in?

0
Posted 23 October 2014 at 18:16

Permalink

Double strike

1
Posted 24 October 2014 at 02:00

Permalink

k:)

1
Posted 24 October 2014 at 05:21

Permalink

+1 for the deck, but i was just wondering if not having a creature with 4 power or greater unless you use a pump spell has hurt you any with the ferocious cards like savage punch and roar of challenge?

0
Posted 30 November 2014 at 14:10

Permalink

i have swiftspear now in the deck

0
Posted 03 December 2014 at 18:53

Permalink

I don't play Standard so I don't have much in terms of suggestions. This looks like a pretty sick deck though and very simple design. I'll leave a +1 Like.

Hate to advertise, but I'm always looking for feedback on the decks I build. If you have time, check out my newest deck on here (I play modern)

http://www.mtgvault.com/thegreatmunchkin/decks/descent-infinitium/

0
Posted 18 September 2015 at 01:23

Permalink