demonking28

362 Decks, 2,044 Comments, 737 Reputation

the problem with both of those cards, they slow the deck down more than speed it it up.

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 07 September 2013 at 20:33 in reply to #395290 on High Octane

Permalink

that might be deserving of a spot.

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 06 September 2013 at 16:04 in reply to #394955 on In this Light(Dragons)

Permalink

hahah yah that would just be another slap in the face. XD

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 06 September 2013 at 15:46 in reply to #394761 on In this Light(Dragons)

Permalink

hmm since looking at it, it probably wouldn't hurt to try and keep it more modern legal. i think legacy maybe even casual play this may not stand too much of a chance. my group doesnt know how to stop it very well, pretty much the only way i get away with using the deck lol.

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 05 September 2013 at 23:13 in reply to #394761 on In this Light(Dragons)

Permalink

hmm ill look into the options out there. hadnt thought about LD as a way to stall .

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 05 September 2013 at 21:22 in reply to #394761 on In this Light(Dragons)

Permalink

i thought about it when i made this, just the mana curve was hard to figure out already lol.
thx, it is one of my best dragon decks yet.

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 05 September 2013 at 19:46 in reply to #394730 on Sun's Dragons

Permalink

yup yup.. i got one from a buddy of mine who didnt think it through. i have a jund commander using the tryant of jund as the commander. i was able to do 500 points of damage in one shot by turn 10 hahahaha.

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 05 September 2013 at 18:07 in reply to #394667 on In this Light(Dragons)

Permalink

yup that much is true. its ok though b/c dragon deck lol. on a side note, i really do own like 90% of the deck and it works pretty good actually. gettin hard to get more scrouge though....

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 05 September 2013 at 17:42 in reply to #394667 on In this Light(Dragons)

Permalink

haha pretty much and thx. yah i originally used earthquake but with the addition of PWs lately, gotta have a way to keep them off the field too lol.

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

1
Posted 05 September 2013 at 17:25 in reply to #394667 on In this Light(Dragons)

Permalink

not a bad build but keep in mind u will be slow eventually. i have built countless dragon based decks and my first 10 or so were not too different than this. but i found that they tend to be slow and my friends would be impressed when a dragon or two arrived but it was quickly killed or i was....

that is y i built this monster to unleash upon my friends. it actually is a blast to use and no one ever sees it coming. maybe this will give ya some ideas on others cards to consider.

http://www.mtgvault.com/demonking28/decks/suns-dragons/

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 05 September 2013 at 16:29 as a comment on Dragons ftw

Permalink

ill have too look into those. they might make for some fun sb options or something. lol thx.

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 04 September 2013 at 00:19 in reply to #392759 on Primal Dragon

Permalink

ill think about him being an add to the deck or not.

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

-1
Posted 04 September 2013 at 00:19 in reply to #393678 on Standard Crater

Permalink

lol uh thx. not incredible just twisted.

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 04 September 2013 at 00:18 in reply to #394128 on Standard Crater

Permalink

ill give it more thought lol.

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 04 September 2013 at 00:18 in reply to #393720 on Standard Crater

Permalink

from what i have seen so far, there r a few toys that would be pretty awesome here. idk i feel like that garruk would be too bulky in this deck. its a stompy build after all.

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 02 September 2013 at 13:39 in reply to #393720 on Standard Crater

Permalink

the theme for the deck is y the witchstalker is in. i thought about the garruk but feel he is just too bulky here. maybe Theros will have a few toys here.

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 02 September 2013 at 13:38 in reply to #393678 on Standard Crater

Permalink

sort of. i know what ur thinking chew but One goes with the theme here as well. this is a standard stompy deck and he just gets bigger by the turns till he reaches a 3/3. by then its more than likely ganna be game over.

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 02 September 2013 at 13:37 in reply to #393672 on Standard Crater

Permalink

thx and yah that was my idea on the design. and just in case it isnt enough, u can sub in the surges to just drop everything at one time. the createrhoofs alone could kill if everything is dumped lol.

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 02 September 2013 at 01:09 in reply to #393605 on Standard Crater

Permalink

what do u mean??

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 30 August 2013 at 17:59 in reply to #391534 on Primal Dragon

Permalink

hmm i could see those as SB options. haha thx. i would really like to see someone build this animal. i have probably 80% of the deck as it stands right now. those lands r the hardest things to get really.

http://cardgametalk.blogspot.com/

0
Posted 29 August 2013 at 19:41 in reply to #392759 on Primal Dragon

Permalink

161-180 of 2,029 items