Never Ending Sacrifice

by Claeb on 09 October 2013

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Creatures (4)


Instants (7)

Artifacts (4)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

A Dimir Deck focused On Keeping Your Opponents Battlefield Cleared By Control Spells And Ability Creatures. My Favorite Combo Is The Agoraphobia/Agent Of The Fates. Just Keep Playing/Returning Agoraphobia To Keep A Constant Sacrifice Engine On The field. Combined With Desecration Demon And Your Opponent Will Hopefully Never To Maintain Board Presence.

Ashiok DOes What Ashiok Is Good At. Jace Helps You Get To Those Cards You Need Faster. And Nightveil spectre Gives You an Additional Library Of Cards To Play With Plus It's A Nice Chunk Of Devotion Toward Thassa.
Consuming Aberration May Start Weak, But With The Constant Creature Kill And Playing Of Agoraphobia, It's Power Will Only Grow. Plus Thassa Can Make It Unblockable.

Any Suggestions Are Appreciated!

Deck Tags

  • Standard
  • Sacrifice
  • Control
  • Thassa

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

40
Likes

This deck has been viewed 7,905 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0304500

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Never Ending Sacrifice

Lol Nice Combo right there man! i never thought of that combo the aqoraphobia with Agent of the fates! That's gonna rage people so hard :D

2
Posted 10 October 2013 at 00:46

Permalink

Thanks, Man! :D
The Agoraphobia Has always Been One Of My Guilty Pleasures Lol.
I'm Just Glad It's Found A Good Reason To Actually See Play.

0
Posted 10 October 2013 at 02:40

Permalink

Yeah man! very good reason thank god for agent of the fates to make it happen!

1
Posted 10 October 2013 at 04:14

Permalink

Yeah, that'll really slow your opponent!
Using a card like Consuming Aberration could really do some damage in that combo

1
Posted 10 October 2013 at 22:37

Permalink

At First I wasn'tThe Feeling Consuming Aberration. But The More I Think About It, The Card Could Really Get Out Of Hand If The Combo Was Getting Through. Though Would You Feel That Aetherling May Be A Better Closer?

0
Posted 11 October 2013 at 00:14

Permalink

If your consistanlty playing Agroaphobia, then Aberration is a much better option. All you really need after that is Rogue's Passage to slip it through the back door

1
Posted 11 October 2013 at 00:21

Permalink

Aberration has no way to protect it self, does not have trample or unblockable (although wiht thassa you can give it that) I'd say Aetherling is safer, but Aberration is cooler :D

1
Posted 11 October 2013 at 08:33

Permalink

Aetherling Has Gone Into The SB :)

0
Posted 11 October 2013 at 12:43

Permalink

Nice idea with the deck here, I have a similar thing going with Gift of Immortality instead on this deck: http://www.mtgvault.com/jestrix/decks/curse-of-immortality/

Since you're running blue, I'd love to see 4 Mizzium skin. Since the agent is only 2 toughness he will be targeted with every burn there is (and any other removal for that matter) Maybe drop the Bident (you don't really have enough creatures to make it worth your while, or?) Drop 1 Heroes downfall and a Read the Bones as well as 1 Dissolve ?

2
Posted 10 October 2013 at 06:20

Permalink

I Thought t MizziumSkin. I Think That Is A Great Idea. The Bident Is Going Bye-dent... I Couldn't Help Myself :x

3
Posted 10 October 2013 at 13:28

Permalink

I like the concept... ...Thassa isn't good here... ...you won't make the devotion... ...the Specter is a sideboard type of card... ...what do you target the Agent with other than Thassa??.....

You should use Aqueous Form.......

1
Posted 10 October 2013 at 06:27

Permalink

Heroic is only triggered by spells, so Thassa isn't there for that reason is my guess. I think the Unblockable is awesome on her and the scry ain't half bad.

What he targets the agent with is Agoraphobia, over and over again :P

4
Posted 10 October 2013 at 07:46

Permalink

that's gonna make other people rage =D

2
Posted 10 October 2013 at 13:01

Permalink

She Is Mostly There For Scry And depending On Devotion Another Win Condition.
I Lack DrawPower So Having A Scry Engine Is A Nice Addition. I Do Agree About The Nightveil spectre. Maybe Drop It Down To 2 InFavor Of 2 Aetherlings? Also Thanks For All The Love With The Combo TrIck Haha. I Really Want To See Peple's Reaction If I Can Ever Get It Goin.

2
Posted 10 October 2013 at 13:24

Permalink

dude im playing magic tonight with my friends and using thise deck combo will rage them so hard :D

2
Posted 10 October 2013 at 13:35

Permalink

Hells Yeah! Definitely Let Me Know How The Experience Treats them Haha!

0
Posted 10 October 2013 at 13:41

Permalink

I see... ...I really have gotten out of practice... :)

I haven't seen this combo... ...this is amazing! :)

1
Posted 10 October 2013 at 15:20

Permalink

...by the way... ...I have a quite easy, but nice combo here with Stormbreath Dragon & Supreme Verdict(won't effect it) :)

http://www.mtgvault.com/poetmasterx/decks/medomais-revelation/

1
Posted 10 October 2013 at 15:23

Permalink

Verdict does destroy storm breath.... Verdict goes through any protection

1
Posted 10 October 2013 at 15:28

Permalink

I thought protection is not about targeting, but against any effect.......

1
Posted 10 October 2013 at 16:00

Permalink

Thanks For The Compliment :)
Sadly The Protection Doesn't Save Stormbreath Since It's Not Actually The Target
Ta

2
Posted 10 October 2013 at 17:09

Permalink

Poet, protection keeps u from targeting it with a spell that has that color in it. Also if protection is on a creature, and it blocks a creature of that color, then it will take no dmg. however, if u are playing say phyxrian obliterator, and attack and he blocks with a pro. black creature he will still sacrifice 2 permanents, do to dealing 2 dmg to the P.O.

1
Posted 10 October 2013 at 18:53

Permalink

5 mana combo? seems legit I guess

0
Posted 11 October 2013 at 03:13

Permalink

Just another thought on the "protection stuff problem" that we've been discussing in the reacent dayes...

Doesn't the rule of protection sayes that effects(any effect) that sayes "destroy" doesn't effect that certain permenent?..

I'm sure these stuff were clear to me a year ago, but now I lack a lil' bit of knowlage... ...the effect of a global spell that does not target any permenent &/or player still counts as an effect, right?..


Also... ...I've made a deck with Agent of Fates & it turned out competative, though the rhythm is not perfect...

Any suggestions are wellcome here: http://www.mtgvault.com/poetmasterx/decks/agent-of-desecration/


0
Posted 12 October 2013 at 20:12

Permalink

Poet, protection only protects from being targeted and damage. Pro white won't protect a creature from supreme verdict because it doesn't target or deal damage. However, a pro red creature won't get hit by an Anger of the Gods because even tough it isn't targeting the creature it is dealing damage. If protection stopped destroy effects then there wouldn't be much sense in keeping the indestructible ability around would there?

0
Posted 17 October 2013 at 00:43

Permalink

...true... ...I just thought that the "effects that say destroy won't destroy it" was stated in the rule of protection, but it only appears in the rule of indestructible.... ...I remambered the wrong way....... :)

0
Posted 17 October 2013 at 16:21

Permalink

Shouldn't use any artifact - equipment to do the same thing and just switch Agent of the Fates cards to do it to the entire deck? If that's true, just take out Thassa for Witches' Eye and use only one mana to switch between two Agent of the Fates cards and clear the entire board... lol [does this account for the artifact equip ability, or is this the effect that doesn't count for this... please let me know].

1
Posted 10 October 2013 at 18:36

Permalink

No, as equipping a creature is not a "spell", so unfortunately that do not work :)

1
Posted 10 October 2013 at 18:47

Permalink

Why Did You Capitalize The First Letter Of Every Word In Your Description?

0
Posted 10 October 2013 at 20:13

Permalink

Because his phone does it automatically for some reason on this webpage (read above) :P

1
Posted 10 October 2013 at 20:29

Permalink

It happened on another deck that he was on I do believe

1
Posted 10 October 2013 at 22:36

Permalink

goddamn man! i may try agoraphobia in a build im doing! i have a list up if you dont mind checking it out! thanks for putting this idea out there! (:

-infact dawg, please check out my deck! http://www.mtgvault.com/powdereddonut/decks/blueblack-heroic-standard/

i do a little something with a card called hidden strings that i think youre gonna like!

1
Posted 11 October 2013 at 04:04

Permalink

Thanks, Man. I Really Appreciate The feedback. Post The Deck When You've Finished It, And I Will Check It Out
:)

0
Posted 11 October 2013 at 04:22

Permalink

i edited the link in my first comment! thanks alot man

0
Posted 11 October 2013 at 04:29

Permalink

It works so well!!!!!! It really bothers aggro deck people lmao and even mid range game just so funny how they act toward that combo.

One problem was that person kept controlling the agent of the fates so I decided to put boons of erebors and it really made people rage harder than I thought :D

Loving this deck

0
Posted 11 October 2013 at 04:08

Permalink

That's Awesome! I'm Glad To Hear The Results Are What I Was Hoping For. I Was Recommended Mizzium Skin For A Form Of Protection. Would You Recommend Boon Over That?

0
Posted 11 October 2013 at 04:34

Permalink

That's could work but what if it was supreme verdict it will be useless for that so boons beats any board sweep expect anger of the gods :D

1
Posted 11 October 2013 at 04:42

Permalink

To save the agent from the Verdict, you can cast "Far" on your agent as well :)

1
Posted 11 October 2013 at 08:39

Permalink

How does the deck hold up against control? I was thinking you could maybe sideboard a Notion Thief or two. Would be great to see your opponents face when he has no board presence or hand! Love this combo, great job.

1
Posted 11 October 2013 at 08:50

Permalink

Thanks, Man. I Really Appreciate The Input. I Think Notion Thief Is A Solid Idea For My Sideboard. It's Getting Added Immediately. My SB Is Filled With Counter Spells And Jace To Help Against Control, But I Think I Could Drop The Jace For Aetherling That Way I Have A Little More Protection From A Kill Spell. Maybe That Would Make My SB better For Control?

0
Posted 11 October 2013 at 12:35

Permalink

Aetherling I totally forgot about lol, 4 of them is maybe a bit overkill 2x should be enough. Sideboard looks good, anyway of main decking the Aetherlings? I only suggest to give another win-con.

0
Posted 11 October 2013 at 13:34

Permalink

My Phone Hates Me Lol. Not Only Does It Capitalize Every First Letter Of Words I Type, But It Doubles Edits To Cards If I Refresh The Page.
But I Definitely Agree About Main Decking Aetherling. Aberration Can Deal OutDamage Faster If Coupled With Other , But Aetherling Would Be More Reliable

0
Posted 11 October 2013 at 13:57

Permalink

Both true and false. Aberration is more likely to kill faster, given the right circumstances (which seems to appear a lot!). But AEtherling is used in most control decks because of its abilities, so I see how it would work

Better off to keep both personally

0
Posted 17 October 2013 at 22:44

Permalink

You know what you need... More cow bell, every deck needs more cow bell. But seriously sweet deck, can't wait to see it in action so long as its not against me!

2
Posted 11 October 2013 at 13:38

Permalink

Hidden Strings. If you can keep swinging through with something you can use a Ciphered Hidden Strings to psuedo-ramp or target Agent of the Fates with another option (and if Agent is the one attacking, he has Psuedo-Vigilance while he makes them sac a creature every turn).

1
Posted 12 October 2013 at 20:03

Permalink

Wouldn't Erebos fit in the deck better than Thassa? You said you need draw power, and I think drawing a card and losing one life is much better than just scrying - especially if your opponent has no board presence (which is ultimately the idea of your deck, making them sacrifice everything). Also, all of your creatures give massive devotion towards black, so he'd be a creature more often than not.
Also, while Consuming Aberration is cool, I don't see how it fits with the deck - I think something like Grey Merchant of Ashpodel would work better (while still being a cheap card in terms of real money).
Finally, Swan Song is NOT good unless you're playing against a legacy combo deck - so unless you find yourself losing on turn 2 or 3 all the time you should take it out of the sideboard and put something else in.

1
Posted 13 October 2013 at 23:46

Permalink

Consuming Aberation mills a land out every time you play a spell. Combined with Agoraphobia, that's a land mill AND a dead creature!

0
Posted 13 October 2013 at 23:49

Permalink

Awesome deck idea! I had a similar idea as well.

Here's mine...
http://www.mtgvault.com/djbigj/decks/sacrificial-fate/

0
Posted 14 October 2013 at 18:06

Permalink

Cool Standard Deck bro, check mine out :P
http://www.mtgvault.com/mrmulligan/decks/apostles-demon/

0
Posted 16 October 2013 at 02:21

Permalink

I have a similar infinite sacrificing deck:
http://www.mtgvault.com/s0rinmark0v/decks/deathless-mill/
I'd love some feedback on it!

0
Posted 17 October 2013 at 01:11

Permalink

nice I added red for a grixis control deck I have irl
http://www.mtgvault.com/thatsign/decks/grixis-superdemonscontrol/

0
Posted 27 October 2013 at 05:50

Permalink

You could use Hidden Strings or trait doctoring.

0
Posted 27 October 2013 at 17:00

Permalink

THOUGHTSEIZE!

0
Posted 29 October 2013 at 18:26

Permalink

Nice deck, Just made these deck and needs some help ..thanks
http://www.mtgvault.com/dragon77/decks/army-of-zombies-lifegain/
http://www.mtgvault.com/dragon77/decks/defenders-way-of-milling/

0
Posted 02 November 2013 at 18:29

Permalink