Infect quick win

by cardkid123 on 03 December 2012

Main Deck (60 cards)

Enchantments (4)


Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

This deck is intended to be a very quick winning deck (turn 2-4). Please comment if you have any ideas on making this deck better! Thanks!

Deck Tags

  • Aggro

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 1,283 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

000828

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Infect quick win

add blazing shoal and a 9+ red CMC card (berzerk would be better but it is incredibly expencive)

see mine is GU infect http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=407323

0
Posted 03 December 2012 at 02:20

Permalink

My hope for this deck is that the game does not last long enough for me or my opponent to play spells that big.

0
Posted 03 December 2012 at 02:33

Permalink

^lol that's the banned modern combo
There's also might of old Krosa +4/4 for 1

0
Posted 03 December 2012 at 02:36

Permalink

But what would i swap that for? I already have a pretty decent ratio between cards that buff and cards that give trample.

0
Posted 03 December 2012 at 02:42

Permalink

Some of the creatures you don't need 16 you might need 12 if that because if somebody doom blades your glistener elf after your pumped up you lose anyway

0
Posted 03 December 2012 at 02:51

Permalink

The only problem with taking out creatures is that, whenever I take a sample hand, I get like 1 creature as it is. -4 more will just lead to a ton of mulligans.

0
Posted 03 December 2012 at 03:01

Permalink

You just need 1 creature thou

0
Posted 03 December 2012 at 04:07

Permalink

Im saying taking out 4 creatures would make it more likely to have 0 creatures and need to mulligan.

0
Posted 03 December 2012 at 04:18

Permalink

If with 12 creatures you routinely don't get a creature you have far worse luck than I do lol

0
Posted 03 December 2012 at 05:13

Permalink

Does anyone else have any tips on this deck?

0
Posted 06 December 2012 at 00:00

Permalink

Does anyone else have any tips on this deck?

0
Posted 06 December 2012 at 01:02

Permalink