Zombie Control

by Bidoof on 27 August 2009

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Zombie themed Aggro/Control Deck. Hopefully its good XD.

Deck Tags

  • Other...

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,181 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0244600

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Zombie Control

i'd replace counterspell with essence scatter. waaay better IMHO. especially since you already have 4x countersqualls. also, i'd replace grixis grimblade with some other zombie. because you dont have any multi colored permanents.. I'd replace all 4 with 4 vedalken ghouls.
zombie control FTW!

0
Posted 28 August 2009 at 00:28

Permalink

Hmm okay :O. I'll make some changes then xD.

0
Posted 28 August 2009 at 00:42

Permalink

wait essence scatter only counters creature spells while counterspell counters all spells o O, unless you're saying its better because of the cost?

0
Posted 28 August 2009 at 00:44

Permalink

it looks good and all, but just so u know cemetary reaper and liliana dont mix well, cemetary reaper removes creatures and liliana needs them to reanimate them for u

0
Posted 28 August 2009 at 01:15

Permalink

o also maybe throw a gravespawn sovereign in this and maybe a gravepact with any sac engine u can find and that will help with ur reaper or ur liliana later or even the sovereign if u put it in

0
Posted 28 August 2009 at 01:17

Permalink

wow, your deck is EVIL! nice =D

0
Posted 28 August 2009 at 13:22

Permalink

@Bidoof oh right.. i was just thinking about making it Type 2 legal. haha my bad :) keep it.

0
Posted 29 August 2009 at 00:36

Permalink