Izzet GG/GN? Umhuh, for $20!

by BenWare on 08 September 2013

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Instants (6)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

My version of Memnite's $20 turn 4 win budget deck, just a little more creature heavy.

Deck Tags

  • Standard

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

6
Likes

This deck has been viewed 2,710 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0200364

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Izzet GG/GN? Umhuh, for $20!

Any ideas for a side board are welcome.

0
Posted 08 September 2013 at 20:45

Permalink

Skullcrack will keep from people being able to fog you, if that seems to be a problem.

1
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:10

Permalink

added to the S/B. As always, thanks for your words of wisdom Polo!

0
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:12

Permalink

Anytime.

0
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:16

Permalink

What does the GG/GN stand for?

0
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:19

Permalink

How exactly does Skullcrack counter Fog?

0
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:19

Permalink

Good game/ Good night!

0
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:19

Permalink

it says damage can't be prevented this turn, so I assume that means Fog doesn't work.

1
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:20

Permalink

I keeps damage from being prevented. Which is what fog does.

1
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:20

Permalink

WHY IS EVERYONE COMMENTING AT THE SAME TIME!!! ARGH!

My face hurts.

1
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:21

Permalink

Oh, true. Funny how I overlooked the second line every time.

0
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:21

Permalink

Fog prevents combat damage. Skullcrack says damage cannot be prevented this turn.

1
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:21

Permalink

because the deck sucks so bad! That's why it gets likes, comments, and bashings!! Aren't you up to date with how the vault works!?

-1
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:22

Permalink

Damn, now my face hurts!

0
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:22

Permalink

Ain't it a bitch?

0
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:24

Permalink

I hate to say this, because i love the card. But with 24 lands and your highest mana cost for instance and sorceries being 2, do you really need Goblin Electromancer?

1
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:22

Permalink

Probably not. I actually thought about molten birth or a burn of some type. Any ideas?

0
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:24

Permalink

Molten Birth would be fine. I was never really one who used burn spells, so you may want to ask someone else about that.

1
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:26

Permalink

Volcanic Geyser is in, Electromancer out!

1
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:28

Permalink

What about throwing in some Wild Guess or something for card draw?

1
Posted 08 September 2013 at 22:30

Permalink

In place of what. I'm game to change it up a little. Divination might work too, but at the expense of what cards?

0
Posted 08 September 2013 at 22:31

Permalink

Honestly, I would take out four lands, make it 20 total, since your card costs are so low.

0
Posted 08 September 2013 at 23:25

Permalink

Added! Thanks for the input!

0
Posted 08 September 2013 at 23:41

Permalink

Any ideas on http://www.mtgvault.com/benware/decks/quietus-please/ are appreciated, as well!

0
Posted 08 September 2013 at 21:58

Permalink

Hmm, where have I seen this before . . .

-2
Posted 08 September 2013 at 22:18

Permalink

Probably looks a little like Mimnite's deck....that's why I gave him credit in the description Mr. Sarcasm.

1
Posted 08 September 2013 at 22:27

Permalink

Anyway, the most important part of a combo deck is getting the stuff you need. That means wading through a bunch of junk. I personally feel like 4 Faithless Lootings go a long way, and are preferable to Desperate Ravings.

0
Posted 09 September 2013 at 01:12

Permalink

Divinations are in S/B, in case they are needed. However, I'm not sure anything in this one is "junk," being they all benefit from any instant or sorcery played.

0
Posted 09 September 2013 at 01:22

Permalink

Although, I think the Lootings would work too. I just hate having to discard cards to use it.

0
Posted 09 September 2013 at 01:42

Permalink

You cannot win with this deck (in most cases) without Guttersnipe or Nivix Cyclops. Thus, you must churn through your library to find them. Faithless Looting has the advantage of cheapness for the first cast and a Flashback cost. That means a single Loot can munch through 4 draw steps.

0
Posted 09 September 2013 at 09:16

Permalink

cool deck. check one of mine that i just made
http://www.mtgvault.com/brm13/decks/sphinxs-apostle/

-2
Posted 08 September 2013 at 23:35

Permalink

your deck is too lopsided for what its trying to do.

Note your mana distribution. The original had a blue/red distribution of 26/27. Yours is 24 blue and 30-frikkin-6 RED.
Also look at your mana curve. The original had 3 mana for its highest drops. yours goes all the way up to 4.

Overall its a nice reiteration of the deck, but definitely not an improvement by any account.

0
Posted 09 September 2013 at 02:59

Permalink

Did I say this was an improved version, or just what I'm running? Maybe I mistyped somewhere that I had improved upon the original...If so, I'm sorry. Never intended to type that, if in fact I did. Just posting my version, of cards I'm running in mine.

1
Posted 12 September 2013 at 22:00

Permalink

I would probably drop the armed and dangerous for turn and burn

0
Posted 11 September 2013 at 13:28

Permalink

And pull the pyromancer for izzet static caster

0
Posted 11 September 2013 at 13:49

Permalink

And maybe drop the geyser for counterflux

0
Posted 11 September 2013 at 13:57

Permalink

Armed is THE biggie in this one. Why would I drop that?

1
Posted 12 September 2013 at 22:00

Permalink

Because it seems that a quick rdw would give you some problems I faced a similar deck at an fnm and ran the guy over with my aristocrats build

0
Posted 13 September 2013 at 03:04

Permalink

So you forgot everything about old professor wdm?

Well I'm back to spamming people with weird stuff, and this time it's actually something a bit more usefull than advice on mill!

I hereby invite you to participate in a brand new trend in deckdesigning that might change the future of how to design decks.

Shortly told, there are two ways that new decktypes are made, the first is by designing something new, the second is by taking the best parts of two older decks, mix it together and you got a new decktype!!!

What I suggest is a turbo-version of mixing two different decktypes into a new one.

You simply split up existing designs into deckhalves (Called halfdecks) that are designed so that they keep as much of the origanal themes of a deck intact, and so that the half can be thrown together with almost any other halfdeck deigned in the future.

Splitting a deck up in two times 30 cards is not so easy as it sounds, so initially this trend will start out slowly, and if enough people adapt the idea it will probably explode into radical new decktypes made from decks designed with halfdecking in mind.

To get a better understanding of the concept you might need to take a look at the first 3 deckhalves I've made as examples. (Bear in mind that they were designed very roughly from memory)

I will improve these designs and add other deckhalves as fast as possible to start up the trend.

YOU, and everyone else that recieve this "spam" are welcome to start up your own version of this project, as it is intended to become everyones, and only by letting several minds work on it independently will it take on a better shape and spread out as a new deckbuilding tool.

Contact me at any time, with any questions you may have.

I only have one wish on how this new trend can be spread. If everyone involved tag their decks as halfdecks then the future halfdeck community may simply write halfdeck in the decksearching function to find what they are looking for!

The first half of a "death and taxes"-deck: (Only a sketch, not the real thing)
http://www.mtgvault.com/wickeddarkman/decks/legacy-halfdeck-001/

The second half of a "death and taxes"-deck: (Only a sketch, not the real thing)
http://www.mtgvault.com/wickeddarkman/decks/legacy-halfdeck-002/

The red half of a U/R delver-deck: (Only a sketch, not the real thing)
http://www.mtgvault.com/wickeddarkman/decks/legacy-halfdeck-003/

-1
Posted 18 November 2013 at 12:44

Permalink