Onward Nimsy!

by AtomicVoodoo on 23 May 2017

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Sorceries (7)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


How to Play

Captain's Claws+Turntimber Ranger(+Parallel Lives)= Mass amounts of puppies!

Deck Tags

  • ponies
  • Wolves
  • Elves
  • Kor

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,322 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

1300030

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Onward Nimsy!

Why use captains claws?

0
Posted 24 May 2017 at 18:21

Permalink

It feeds the ally trigger for Turntimber Ranger.

0
Posted 25 May 2017 at 05:53

Permalink

Oh okay, but you should use raised by wolves.

0
Posted 25 May 2017 at 16:18

Permalink

Nah dude. 4 Rangers far outweighs 4 Raised by wolves. If this was a token stomp deck then yes I would have gone with Raised By Wolves but it's a token overrun deck and Ranger generates far more tokens.

0
Posted 26 May 2017 at 01:36

Permalink

Their isn't quit enough Allies to keep doing that efficiently.

0
Posted 26 May 2017 at 20:45

Permalink

Dude... If you have a Ranger equipped with two claws and another ranger on the field that's 4 wolves per turn. Lets say two rangers on the field and you play another, that's three wolves. Rangers are far better here.

0
Posted 27 May 2017 at 03:44

Permalink

Yes, but that is if, you need a back up or maybe more of the same concept to do this with more synergy.

0
Posted 30 May 2017 at 19:10

Permalink

There is plenty of synergy here.

0
Posted 30 May 2017 at 19:49

Permalink

Their is very little cards that may allow you to pull this combo off though. Example, Captains claws and the ranger, that is it, so you could throw more allies, but that is really all you can do to improve this combo to do this even more.

0
Posted 30 May 2017 at 19:56

Permalink

Do you get that this is a token deck and not a combo deck? I really don't think you do.

0
Posted 30 May 2017 at 22:56

Permalink

I do, although you may still need to make these cards correlate better because this combo is really circumstantial.

0
Posted 01 June 2017 at 19:16

Permalink