ArtifactGentleman

66 Decks, 62 Comments, 1 Reputation

Like the quest cards man, should make for a fun game

0
Posted 24 December 2010 at 09:59 as a comment on Flaming Demise!

Permalink

Thanks, they werent cheap to get :P

0
Posted 24 December 2010 at 09:57 in reply to #108835 on Chick Magnet

Permalink

THank you for the comment and suggestion, Im using this deck for Pro Tour in Paris :P

0
Posted 24 December 2010 at 09:45 in reply to #108828 on Chick Magnet

Permalink

Thanks for the suggestion, I will add to it.

0
Posted 23 December 2010 at 10:54 in reply to #108516 on Blue Artifact Infect

Permalink

The third one is making use of etched champion to win

0
Posted 22 December 2010 at 08:24 as a comment on Revive and Scare

Permalink

right, what happens is the first strategy is to get the metal craft going, so the cheap cards are there, and then, I get indomitable angel and liquimetal coating to protect her out and put shroud, and then I get myr battle sphere, but if ever I didnt the Angel but the shpere first, it will most likely be a target, so I counter that with a nim deathmantle plus that means more myr on the field, there are essentially three different ways to win a game, so based on the draw, pick one.

0
Posted 22 December 2010 at 08:24 as a comment on Revive and Scare

Permalink

Thats a good deck man, but Im more of a die hard Mirran, was kinda hoping to resolve my metalcraft problem. But thanks for trying, and if I was ok with phyxerians, then this deck is brilliant

0
Posted 22 December 2010 at 03:00 in reply to #108093 on Unstoppable; Unbreakable

Permalink

I dont have any of those cards at the moment

0
Posted 21 December 2010 at 23:35 in reply to #108048 on Unstoppable; Unbreakable

Permalink

I would, but I cant find any other red white land card. besides, fetchlands may help thin out my deck enough to get the cards I need on the turn.

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 22:39 in reply to #107409 on It taste better slow roasted

Permalink

ohhh, shit really thought I had something there, dang... oh well, is it a good deck though?

0
Posted 17 December 2010 at 10:27 in reply to #106460 on Power of 8

Permalink

rule of 9?
What is that?

0
Posted 17 December 2010 at 10:08 in reply to #106460 on Power of 8

Permalink

Well, it was basically a test try, thank you for the comments, it will be better

0
Posted 16 December 2010 at 06:46 as a comment on Pro-Tour Metalcraft Burn

Permalink

I agree, I do need some more zero cost artifacts on, but I'm basing it on what I actually have, surprisingly enough I dont have memnites, I should start collecting

0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 05:27 in reply to #105773 on Pro-Tour Metalcraft Burn

Permalink

What is the basic focus on this deck though?
I mean, an infect and life damage have completely different tactics, and/or styles. That is just one noticeable conflict. I have tried decks similar to this and the precursor golem is a great card to have, but in terms of mana cost, maybe reducing it to two-three, and use the extra space to hammer down on the infect style you are attempting here, and its easy to get it to standard just use the steel overseer because that is one affective card. Maybe it might be useful to add "grafted exoskeleton" especially with etched champion on the deck, it might get things started a lot faster

0
Posted 10 December 2010 at 07:55 as a comment on Precursor to Fun

Permalink

Ohhh ok, thanks for the clarification :P

0
Posted 08 December 2010 at 20:50 in reply to #104472 on Hasty Destruction

Permalink

Thanks man, and thanks for the comment

0
Posted 08 December 2010 at 20:46 in reply to #104550 on Hasty Destruction

Permalink

Not to sound like a newb, but what is RDW? ^-^"

Thanks for the comment man, and the fetchlands are really useful, thanks for giving the idea around :P

0
Posted 08 December 2010 at 01:35 in reply to #104472 on Hasty Destruction

Permalink

Ok, I attempted a burn deck with that strategy, you can check it out, I think it might be a good strategy

Link: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=122924

0
Posted 07 December 2010 at 23:19 in reply to #104265 on 3 Stomps, you're DEAD!

Permalink

wow. I never thought of it like that, thats a good tactic, Imma try it in one of my decks one time, thanks for the clarification

0
Posted 07 December 2010 at 17:28 in reply to #104265 on 3 Stomps, you're DEAD!

Permalink

Actually, the strategy is no to use expensive creatures, for quick summoning succession, but I will take it to consideration, thank you

0
Posted 07 December 2010 at 17:25 in reply to #104322 on Flyer Deck (Lets make use of this ability)

Permalink

21-40 of 59 items