Life Exchange (with Vampires/t..

by Archie on 22 February 2010

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Creatures (3)


Instants (2)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

This deck basically revolves around Sanguine Bond, Blood Tribute, and vampires.

**Revisions made. It looks and feels a whole lot faster now.

I got spanked by an aggro Naya deck and an aggro Jund deck. The previous design worked well only against Blue Control. It should be able to handle everything a whole lot better now.

Let me know what you think.

Deck Tags

  • Life Gain

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,250 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

005800

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Life Exchange (with Vampires/type 2)

Let me know what you think. Thanks.

0
Posted 14 March 2010 at 20:20

Permalink

I don't know about those Marshes and that Catacombs.... Whats the point? lol just messing with you. I think the deck is damn good. Even though it sounds like I would get my ass handed to me I would still enjoy taking on this deck. (A+) in my book. Tell me what you think about my decks, I know they are older but when I get some money for some new cards I'll post more.

0
Posted 01 April 2010 at 02:10

Permalink

put in another swamp in place of the catacombs. also, instead of piranha marsh, put leech ridden swamp, because you can do the life loss multiple times. otherwise, great. now for shameless advertisement: check out my blue black deck. Does it have anything to do with this deck? no. bo it doesn't.

0
Posted 06 April 2010 at 21:22

Permalink

Leechridden Swamp is a great idea, except that its from Shadowmoor, and the title of this says Type 2. As for the Catacombs, I was actually about to add 3 more. What is your reason for removing them? It can't be the loss of life, since this deck is all about the life gain. And it surely can't be the nice ability of getting 2 lands out of the library in 1 turn, and still having that land able to tap. What's your reasoning?

0
Posted 07 April 2010 at 03:24

Permalink

It's too slow!
No Bloodchief Ascension?
No Bloodghast?

A good vampire deck should kill your opponent within 5 turns, and leaving them with no creatures on the board.
You have some revising to do, friend. If you want some help, just get a hold of me.

0
Posted 09 April 2010 at 16:21

Permalink

It saddens me to know that a good hand full or even more MTG players just care about winning the game in 5 turns or less. What happend to the fun of it all?

0
Posted 12 July 2010 at 05:45

Permalink