Bant Aggro

by AeternusEclipse on 11 August 2012

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Blue is kinda there, but I like the extra removal.

Ramp into Herald of War, Captain of the Watch, Sigarda, and Bruna. Thalia for those nasty spells.

Deck Tags

  • Mana Ramp

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,713 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

2670023

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Bant Aggro

Bant, I love bant! haha, anyways the deck seems off to a good start! I might reconsider using favorable winds. It does have great synergy with your wingcrafters but I feel that it could be replaces with better things. You should try to go around hexproof and unblockable stuff. You should really consider Invisible stalker! It is cheap cost with hexproof and unblockable. You should also consider predatory rampage! They dont go for much now a days. and they are great for pumping any creature up! Also if you are going for ramp consider farseek! They put lands into play tapped which is amazing! Also if you choose to keep your wingcrafters use strangleroot geist, it has haste and undying great synergy with wingcrafter!

Could you take a look at my bant deck? Any feedback would be great!!

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=372068

0
Posted 11 August 2012 at 19:30

Permalink

Maybe a few more 'creature token' spells would work well here.

0
Posted 13 August 2012 at 13:45

Permalink

I would, but considering how chock full this deck is already, I'm having a hard time trying to replace/insert more cards to make it work better. I'll take it under consideration though, thanks :)

0
Posted 14 August 2012 at 19:50

Permalink