[Budget/Casual] Green Aggro

by addg on 10 October 2015

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sorceries (4)


Instants (4)


Planeswalkers (1)


Artifacts (2)


Enchantments (2)


Land (22)

Sideboard (12 cards)

Instants (2)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Pretty simple dick in my opinion. Any advice is greatly appreciated :D

Changelog:

-2 Vines of Vastwood for +2 Rancor
-2 Kalonian Tusker for +2 forest

Deck Tags

  • Budget
  • Aggro
  • Casual
  • Mono Green

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

3
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,365 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

000074

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for [Budget/Casual] Green Aggro

Nice deck :) May I suggest Rancor? It would be helpful for your set of creatures without effects so they have trample as well. +1 upvote

0
Posted 10 October 2015 at 12:20

Permalink

Thank you! I was thinking about that but 11 of my creatures already have trample. I wasn't sure what to remove if I were to add it. Do you have any suggestions? I was thinking possibly lose a couple vines of vastwood for it.

0
Posted 10 October 2015 at 18:12

Permalink

Yes, I was thinking -2 Vastwood and +2 Rancor, because regardless of the trample effect you get the +2 and if something bounces or kills the creature then Rancor goes back to your hand to be reused :) Hope it helps!

0
Posted 10 October 2015 at 19:15

Permalink

I like the deck! Although may i suggest increasing your land count? You have quite a few high tap creatures, and so getting that land will be important. This will be especially important if you plan to really be aggro and aggressive. Check out this article on some of the statistics on the number of lands and cards in a deck!

http://www.kibble.net/magic/magic10.php

0
Posted 10 October 2015 at 20:13

Permalink

Thank you for the comment and the link. I consider Ranger's path to count as a "land". So as of now I think of my deck having 22 lands. I also have the elvish mystics to help with the early game mana needs. How many more forests do you think would be optimal for this deck? I could see myself adding ~2 more forests, but I do not know what I would replace in my deck. Do you have any suggestions?

0
Posted 10 October 2015 at 21:30

Permalink

I think it looks great now! Having 22 is solid just in case you don't get ur ranger's or mystics. This way you can at least somewhat guarantee mana at a more consistent rate in those early turns :)

0
Posted 11 October 2015 at 13:12

Permalink

Thank you for your feedback :)

0
Posted 11 October 2015 at 16:54

Permalink