I traded out smokestack for into the abyss early on because into the abyss is more immediate. Descent into madness only works on my upkeep, which destroys the point of making the opponent take extra turns.
Permalink
Thanks!Yeah, as far as flying goes, generally I'm simply doing more damage to them with my buffed islandwalk creatures than they can do to me, cause flying generally isn't nearly as mana efficient. Talrand is one of my favorite cards, but I found that as this is an entirely creature focused deck, not that many drakes would ever come into play with him. The size of the deck is actually a result of mill decks, which were especially effective on this deck because of the focus on buffing other merfolk. Often times I would lose cards that I really wanted, but because of the extra cards, I can always be relatively certain I'll draw into something.
really like this deck
Thanks!
& Gibbering descent
restore balance & Survival of the fittest
Sorry, that comment was intended for the guy with the username with numbers, not the bear
No. No it isn't.It's a bunch of cards with madness on a good curve with an adequate mana base (I think) and plenty of discard cards so the madness works.
Yes. It doesn't impede the main deck much, though
Could I have some feedback on this deck?
Can I have some feedback on this deck?
I recommend trading out Stalking Yeti for Deadbridge Goliath. Its the same cost (albeit a different color) for a 5/5 instead of a 3/3
also, what do you think of my blue deck?
Thanks!Good idea.Imma change that right now
anything specific that I could change?I mean, I think I could actually make a deck based on that alone.
could you give suggestions for my other 2 decks?
oh, cool idea! imma try moat insteadIts cheaper than the 1st, and more consistent than the second.
So could I have some feedback from somebody?
Is 61 cards acceptable in competitive play?I generally like the draw I get when I draw a sample hand, but there is no major downside to 1 extra card, right?
1-20 of 21 items