abcdchop

63 Decks, 23 Comments, 2 Reputation

I traded out smokestack for into the abyss early on because into the abyss is more immediate. Descent into madness only works on my upkeep, which destroys the point of making the opponent take extra turns.

0
Posted 02 September 2013 at 18:09 in reply to #393687 on Avoidance of Punishment

Permalink

Thanks!

Yeah, as far as flying goes, generally I'm simply doing more damage to them with my buffed islandwalk creatures than they can do to me, cause flying generally isn't nearly as mana efficient.

Talrand is one of my favorite cards, but I found that as this is an entirely creature focused deck, not that many drakes would ever come into play with him.

The size of the deck is actually a result of mill decks, which were especially effective on this deck because of the focus on buffing other merfolk. Often times I would lose cards that I really wanted, but because of the extra cards, I can always be relatively certain I'll draw into something.

0
Posted 01 September 2013 at 19:21 in reply to #393500 on Merfolk Trickery

Permalink

really like this deck

0
Posted 31 August 2013 at 17:10 as a comment on holy diver

Permalink

Thanks!

0
Posted 31 August 2013 at 16:48 in reply to #393333 on Horrors of the Lich

Permalink

& Gibbering descent

0
Posted 29 August 2013 at 01:59 in reply to #392567 on MADNESS!

Permalink

restore balance & Survival of the fittest

0
Posted 29 August 2013 at 01:58 in reply to #392567 on MADNESS!

Permalink

Sorry, that comment was intended for the guy with the username with numbers, not the bear

0
Posted 28 August 2013 at 23:01 in reply to #392567 on MADNESS!

Permalink

No. No it isn't.

It's a bunch of cards with madness on a good curve with an adequate mana base (I think) and plenty of discard cards so the madness works.

0
Posted 28 August 2013 at 23:00 in reply to #392567 on MADNESS!

Permalink

Yes. It doesn't impede the main deck much, though

0
Posted 04 August 2013 at 03:58 in reply to #385698 on Swarming Rats

Permalink

Could I have some feedback on this deck?

0
Posted 01 August 2013 at 16:17 as a comment on The Big Freeze

Permalink

Can I have some feedback on this deck?

0
Posted 01 August 2013 at 16:17 as a comment on Highrock Castle

Permalink

I recommend trading out Stalking Yeti for Deadbridge Goliath. Its the same cost (albeit a different color) for a 5/5 instead of a 3/3

0
Posted 31 July 2013 at 17:41 as a comment on Auroch Your World!

Permalink

also, what do you think of my blue deck?

0
Posted 31 July 2013 at 17:07 in reply to #384842 on Wrath of the Flame

Permalink

Thanks!
Good idea.
Imma change that right now

0
Posted 31 July 2013 at 17:07 in reply to #384842 on Wrath of the Flame

Permalink

anything specific that I could change?

I mean, I think I could actually make a deck based on that alone.

0
Posted 30 July 2013 at 21:36 in reply to #384397 on Not

Permalink

could you give suggestions for my other 2 decks?

0
Posted 30 July 2013 at 20:53 in reply to #384427 on Wrath of the Wind

Permalink

oh, cool idea! imma try moat instead
Its cheaper than the 1st, and more consistent than the second.

0
Posted 30 July 2013 at 20:52 in reply to #384427 on Wrath of the Wind

Permalink

Could I have some feedback on this deck?

0
Posted 30 July 2013 at 18:35 as a comment on Not

Permalink

So could I have some feedback from somebody?

0
Posted 30 July 2013 at 18:34 as a comment on Wrath of the Sea

Permalink

Is 61 cards acceptable in competitive play?
I generally like the draw I get when I draw a sample hand, but there is no major downside to 1 extra card, right?

0
Posted 30 July 2013 at 17:41 as a comment on Wrath of the Sea

Permalink

1-20 of 21 items

1 2 Last